Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (infinitary)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 08:46:00 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <cf66843efa1009ac34c41aaee1f8f6ae922022dc@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vdrgka$sn2$3@news.muc.de>
 <vds38v$1ih6$6@solani.org> <vdscnj$235p$1@news.muc.de>
 <RJKcnSeCMNokRpz6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <vdto2k$1jte$1@news.muc.de>
 <vdu4mt$18h8h$1@dont-email.me> <vdu874$271t$2@news.muc.de>
 <vdua6f$18vqi$2@dont-email.me>
 <05a3027798506434bf2f30b527e0f57d300e76c3@i2pn2.org>
 <ve0570$1kqpu$2@dont-email.me>
 <6f188d193341a3862f4c788a44dff3dfb27fb6bd@i2pn2.org>
 <81f6f0271a53803c0bf79be304ce2484e33aecda@i2pn2.org>
 <ve0hip$1eu7$1@news.muc.de>
 <7403c9bb7e2d0ac17197c219c6a04eace8fef108@i2pn2.org>
 <ve1up7$1tbus$1@dont-email.me>
 <793eb128231ae1fd2fb4ff56a0bf6e899cb5192a@i2pn2.org>
 <ve359v$24f8f$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:46:00 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1102663"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <ve359v$24f8f$6@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2611
Lines: 31

On 10/8/24 7:33 AM, WM wrote:
> On 08.10.2024 02:53, Richard Damon wrote:
> 
>> His view is that if the values of the existing unit fractions exist, 
>> and we travel up the line from the negative side in increasing value, 
>> it only make sense that there should be a "first" point we reach.
>>
>> The concept, on the face of it, seems logical,
> 
> of course, it is logical.

No, it is erroneous, but based on something that might SEEM logical, but 
has a flaw in it due to an incorrect basic assumption

> 
>> it just is a fact that it doesn't work, and that is in part because of 
>> some of the strange properties that trying to imagine a realized 
>> infinity creates.
> 
> This property is darkness. Without dark elements actual or realized 
> infinity cannot exist.

No, darkness doesn't exist, just as actual infinity is unreachable by 
finite beings.

Your neglect of this fact has just made you insain and blown up your 
logic system.

> 
> Regards, WM
>