Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<cfudneCcz8Mo2vf6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 05:33:41 +0000
Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <45923010-96be-72d0-9ccc-9a43f25f35c4@example.net>
 <3Nqcncx9-a5sKsL6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <305d5af9-8a24-b375-323e-c250bdc27e94@example.net>
 <slrnvm15rf.3j65k.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com>
 <308f34aa-6ce1-f0d0-a31d-7ff5d389237a@example.net>
 <lse763F5ikfU4@mid.individual.net>
 <c5ddad41-242f-03c6-e007-09d2a77f27e5@example.net>
 <lsh3u3Fk1n1U1@mid.individual.net>
 <e7e50d51-84ec-763c-803a-d422441459f0@example.net>
 <vk1hk7$2ub3j$1@dont-email.me>
 <cd557b3d-dbf6-d332-e80d-9726d48611fb@example.net>
 <lsk40rF3kioU6@mid.individual.net>
 <17951ff3-9385-90a5-d3b9-406e9a550b23@example.net>
 <b_6cnQV_MLwE-Pv6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <14f2a483-1cba-a906-b67d-b8fdd8dd54c4@example.net>
 <0vOcnYBW0-xdK_r6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <e94ac757-1e70-58f9-9b7b-f21dcce0c420@example.net>
 <H-ucnX3ng4WEfPX6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <53c5ce5c-c82e-bd9b-c8e3-115ecb14e465@example.net>
From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net>
Organization: wokiesux
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 00:33:41 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <53c5ce5c-c82e-bd9b-c8e3-115ecb14e465@example.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <cfudneCcz8Mo2vf6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Lines: 59
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97
X-Trace: sv3-xo7ywaeLvk1H66P6BC9Iv6HuBINLl97M2kLIqkpuFCM4OY6auerQLLKT3xTnGov0Jvf2wFn0LbJzpkk!Qs3G6SR7nPulcJo0ZqaXseEPOIxu48i5+CVdD6XJJuR2Xmv8DllDsvOUJKA6JJvw6FvmETElSgUS!qlEj2URm869WiJefrMQU
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40

On 12/23/24 6:34 AM, D wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
> 
>>>>  in any useful way - but his giant rocket CAN transport
>>>>  LOTS of stuff into orbit or to the moon.
>>>
>>> Rockets are boring! I was space elevators and shooting magnetically 
>>> accelerated loads into space!
>>
>>
>>  And PRIME terrorist targets  :-)
> 
> This is the truth! But we'll guard those targets with lovely and spiritual
> Habermassian dialogue! ;)
> 
>>  Alas, human brains just aren't really wired for that.
>>  There tend to be 'trades' - and 'stability' is often
>>  one of them. 'Double-alpha' people, who have it all,
>>  are VERY VERY rare.
> 
> I wonder if it is an urban myth that the smarter someone is, the bigger the
> chance some mental problems?


   IN MY EXPERIENCE - it's not really a myth.


>>  BIRD brains ... there are some species that have
>>  spectacular IQ in their little nut-sized brains.
>>  The 'wiring' is a LOT better than in mammals.
> 
> I like ravens. Very cute birds with personality!


   Highly recommended by Woden.


>>  Might be the dinos were a LOT smarter than we like
>>  to believe ... lack of 'tech' does not = stupid.
>>  Could be it took 65 million years for Socrates to
>>  pick up where they left off   :-)
> 
> I vaguely remember a book from when I was a child that ended with the 
> dinosaurs
> leaving the planet on a space ship. I have one distinct image from the 
> end of
> the book when they are leaving. That's all I remember. I wonder if I 
> made it up?

   Um ... don't think any made it off the planet. The
   tech waste that'd be involved developing that kind
   of tech infrastructure would STILL be obvious.

   But as I implied, 'tech' as we tend to think of it
   may not be an indicator of intelligence. Diff
   environs, diff facts, pointy stone bits and such
   may not have been much needed.