Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:20:53 +0000
From: Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: anti-gravity?
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:20:53 -0400
Message-ID: <cpaa2jdi22m4nhbe83cehqdp63ujldoh01@4ax.com>
References: <v01ii2$3tno2$1@dont-email.me> <v01j1u$3tq25$1@dont-email.me> <v01j87$3tt2e$1@dont-email.me> <d0l82jt0vnpvko7ti9apb24ks61td1bg8b@4ax.com> <v01lj1$3u9a1$1@dont-email.me> <v0316h$a4ta$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 65
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-1J22FbkG5xl24XPg6NR6Ml78RNwfsdFPqi9TexFKlNWc4HKPsZA2nxG4VczFU7TQs5pGnbwkzrd9Taq!08jl8aKGLcPF8R+J2e2HMQcZbjAxj2LfTK3imxwIRol5+Z4/N3DhhF2EACpKJ64FjNBGLQ8=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3714

On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:35:27 +0100, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

>On 21/04/2024 01:11, Phil Hobbs wrote:
>> John Larkin <jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:31:19 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
>>> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> jim whitby <news@spockmail.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:19:30 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking for opinion of persons better educatrd than myself.
>>>>> I do know how to spell... most of the time. educatded
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .<https://thedebrief.org/nasa-veterans-propellantless-propulsion-drive-
that-physics-says-shouldnt-work-just-produced-enough-thrust-to-defeat-
earths-gravity/>
>>>
>>> Then it should float in mid-air, or accelerate upward. So why does it
>>> need to be tested in space?

Vacuum to get rid of corona.

Space (orbit really) so tiny forces can be detected and measured.  

A steady one G acceleration would be pretty impressive, and would
settle the issue.


>To avoid embarrassment when it doesn't actually work as claimed!
>> 
>> There’s no gravity gravy train if it gets debunked on the first day.
>> What’s the use of that?
>
>
>Surely it is yet another standard pump and dump models for dodgy fringe 
>science IPOs much like the LENR scams that have been around for decades.
>
>Some genuine engineers who didn't properly understand the physics of 
>gyroscopes have famously announced their anti gravity machines.
>
>Most notably one Eric Laithwaite who once gave the Royal Institution 
>Xmas Lectures in 1966 on magnetic levitation and linear motors before he 
>quite literally went off the rails in 1974.
>
><https://www.rigb.org/explore-science/explore/blog/gyroscope-engineer-and-christmas-lectures>
>
>Great communicator with the public but not very good at physics.

Yeah.  Investment not recommended.

As for our asymmetrical capacitor fellow, there has to be some big
errors in the derivation.  I watched part of his lecture, where he did
note that this force endured even when the HV was turned off, and that
it should therefore accelerate continuously.  Which it doesn't,
despite his theory.  He knew that this was a problem, but figured that
it was fixable.  Hmm.

That fellow reminds me of the inventor I met, described in the SED
thread "Non-Inertial Navigation Technology" (July 2020).  That company
still exists, and he still toils away.  I don't know where the money
comes from.

Joe Gwinn