| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<cr9hcj9ijs2uj7u556i44qlmgv36kaabi0@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: OT US Politics Again. Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:15:21 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 119 Message-ID: <cr9hcj9ijs2uj7u556i44qlmgv36kaabi0@4ax.com> References: <v8r6f9$vcrc$1@dont-email.me> <v9oa1l$1hr3j$1@dont-email.me> <pji1cjl46menhqv9d55svfhf4ispeao7cv@4ax.com> <rbf2cjln1s61df46n4sjgv2pnmmbculb79@4ax.com> <v9u0rb$2ha$1@panix2.panix.com> <52n6cjpdlpuhqp9368623orn0762u8jfmc@4ax.com> <va0hf8$31tlb$2@dont-email.me> <8mcgcj572g27rme12otj0lnqb5413einlf@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 17:15:23 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c25608062811b332ea32833c2bb866ac"; logging-data="1018508"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PwVJG2DcmMN1CXldK5dcsSpEZ3vmYccc=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:kpLyjh8HIkRvxMEtldqVtl+NwJ0= Bytes: 6203 On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 17:09:09 +1000, Mad Hamish <newsunspammelaws@iinet.unspamme.net.au> wrote: >On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:37:28 -0500, Lynn McGuire ><lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 8/19/2024 9:58 AM, Paul S Person wrote: >>> On 18 Aug 2024 23:41:31 -0000, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote: >>>=20 >>>> The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 09:12:15 -0700, Paul S Person >>>>> <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Still probably a bad decision, though. But then, so was the = private >>>>>> server itself. When working for the gummint on gummint time one = really >>>>>> should use the gummint server. It might even be harder to hack = than a >>>>>> private server, who can say? >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps, but Washington has the right to access a server they own = at >>>>> any time they choose without a warrant. >>>> >>>> This is true, but government-owned mail servers have a whole host of >>>> requirements that come down from the DHS, from two-factor = authentication >>>> on down to particular header formats. It's a major pain in the neck >>>> (and it's why small governmental organizations will try and use >>>> unauthorized mail servers whenever they possibly can). >>>> >>>> One of the big deals is that email is considered a public record and >>>> consequently needs to be archived. Its not just that it can be = accessed >>>> by some other governmental organization, it all needs to be archived >>>> in specific ways. This is also a pain, but in the case of something >>>> like the Clinton server in question it's also very important for >>>> historical reference. >>>=20 >>> Which all goes to show why the Trump/Republican attacks on Hillary = for >>> having her own server had a certain ... weight and solidity ... that >>> the other attacks mostly lacked. >>>=20 >>> One of the issues was whether anything on it was classified. I seem = to >>> recall that the story was that some things may have classified >>> elsewhere, but had all been declassified on reaching the State Dept. >>> Which sounds a bit ... loosy goosy ... to me, but then Trump was = found >>> to have undeniably classified paper documents at Mar-a-Lago after he >>> left office. And, since they have it camera, tried to hide them when >>> asked to give them up. >>>=20 >>> Hillary's mail server seems almost ... quaint ... in comparison. = Still >>> not a good idea, however. >> >>Trump, as PRESIDENT of the USA, had the power to declassify ANYTHING he= =20 >>wanted to.=20 > >'In all cases, however, a formal procedure is required so governmental >agencies know with certainty what has been declassified and decisions >memorialized. A federal appeals court in a 2020 Freedom of Information >Act case, New York Times v. CIA, underscored that point: >=93Declassification cannot occur unless designated officials follow >specified procedures,=94 the court said.' > >> All those supposedly classified papers were declassified by=20 >>him while he was President. > >No they weren't=20 >as he acknowledges in a transcipt of a meeting where he was showing >people papers he'd taken=20 > >https://abcnews.go.com/US/secret-information-trump-audio-recording-talks= -declassifying-documents/story?id=3D99960824 >Trump is heard on the audio recording saying, as described to ABC >News, "As president I could have declassified, but now I can't." > >"Except it is like, highly confidential. Secret. This is secret >information. Look, look at this. This was done by the military and >given to me,"=20 > >"Well, with Milley -- uh, let me see that, I'll show you an example. >He said that I wanted to attack Iran. Isn't that amazing? I have a big >pile of papers, this thing just came up. Look. This was him. They >presented me this -- this is off the record, but -- they presented me >this. This was him. This was the Defense Department and him," > >> >>And now the case has been thrown out of court due to the improper=20 >>appointment of the prosecutor > >No, the Trump appointed judge has decided that the appoinment of the >Special Counsel was improperly selected >A judgement that goes against decades of precedent >=93The dismissal of the case deviates from the uniform conclusion of all >previous courts to have considered the issue that the Attorney General >is statutorily authorized to appoint a Special Counsel," > >> and the mismanagement of the papers seized=20 >>from Trump's house.=20 > >Bullshit > >> Trump has now filed a civil lawsuit against the DOJ=20 >>for $100 million due to the incompetence of the DOJ. >> >Sure, Trump suing somebody just proves there's a lawyer dumb enough to >take his case and hope they'll eventually get paid... Or one smart enough to insist on getting 1/3d off the top. --=20 "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino, Who evil spoke of everyone but God, Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"