Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 19:51:46 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <d016e11a2de50634e4b6dd14b9fe192066a00d0b@i2pn2.org>
References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vrq330$3dq3n$1@dont-email.me>
 <e7268e8ef47579cacb49b0533d51549a77eb0b96@i2pn2.org>
 <vrqb6f$3k9kh$2@dont-email.me>
 <3f250e699762cfe6fccc844f10eb04f32d470b6a@i2pn2.org>
 <vrrpcl$11a56$4@dont-email.me>
 <8423998561d8feee807509b0ed6335123d35a7c9@i2pn2.org>
 <vrt3gv$264jb$4@dont-email.me>
 <448c82acff6b5fc1d2aa266be92df6f778ec2c6a@i2pn2.org>
 <vru5tp$38ob9$1@dont-email.me>
 <ac61f679d7ddb39b0ceaedd7f562899d36346535@i2pn2.org>
 <vrvccp$aq8m$3@dont-email.me>
 <e166831a8e02332d64ec151f61481e2629e6e53a@i2pn2.org>
 <vrvsh4$p4vd$2@dont-email.me>
 <c93030bbd81fb313c76c256c6e54beb48b07dfdd@i2pn2.org>
 <vs1vuv$2ot1m$1@dont-email.me>
 <d2f86fad6c5823e3c098f30d331576c52263b398@i2pn2.org>
 <vs2fgn$354gv$5@dont-email.me>
 <61f821b5a18046ab36ddb6c52a003b574cf34de6@i2pn2.org>
 <vs2hnm$38lvq$1@dont-email.me>
 <9be1ff2af6bbf405565b27bc8211adf9f353e9f2@i2pn2.org>
 <vs44b6$qjc3$1@dont-email.me>
 <3ff8345ef2ddb51594c67cf7f5cbb81f696afbc5@i2pn2.org>
 <vs4nlf$1c1ja$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 23:51:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2041611"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vs4nlf$1c1ja$4@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3602
Lines: 38

On 3/27/25 7:40 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 3/27/2025 4:56 PM, joes wrote:
>> Am Thu, 27 Mar 2025 13:10:46 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 3/27/2025 6:02 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 3/26/25 11:47 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 3/26/2025 10:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/26/25 11:09 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/26/2025 8:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> Non-Halting is that the machine won't reach its final staste even
>>>>>>>> if an unbounded number of steps are emulated. Since HHH doesn't do
>>>>>>>> that, it isn't showing non-halting.
>>>>>>> DDD emulated by any HHH will never reach its final state in an
>>>>>>> unbounded number of steps.
>>>>>> But DDD emulated by an actually correct emulator will,
>>>>> If you were not intentionally persisting in a lie you would
>>>>> acknowledge the dead obvious that DDD emulated by HHH according to the
>>>>> semantics of the x86 language cannot possibly correctly reach its
>>>>> final halt state.
> 
>> Yes, HHH is not a correct simulator.
>>
> 
> In other words you either disagree with the x86 language
> or don't have a clue about it.
> 

No, it is YOU who does, as you think the x86 language somewhere has a 
definition that the call to some address starts an x86 level emulator.

It has no such thing, a call instruction only transfers execution to the 
subroutine called.

Even at a meta-logic level of emulation, a call to an emulator only 
become equivalent to calling the program emulated if the emulator is 
actually a COMPLETE and correct emulator, no aborting allowed.

Sorry, you are just proving that all your logic is based on FRAUD and lies.