Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies
 non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 08:42:59 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <d05963c8e913d576e0184750ce352d31d68d125f@i2pn2.org>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vp1jkg$1kstl$1@dont-email.me>
	<vp1qp1$1m05h$2@dont-email.me> <vp46l6$26r1n$1@dont-email.me>
	<vp5t55$2gt2s$1@dont-email.me> <vp6pmb$2opvi$1@dont-email.me>
	<vp8700$30tdq$1@dont-email.me> <vp9ct8$3af6t$1@dont-email.me>
	<vpav34$3jct4$1@dont-email.me> <vpc3u9$3skb7$1@dont-email.me>
	<vpcsvk$irt$2@dont-email.me> <vpev2e$fgop$1@dont-email.me>
	<vpfmpp$j7qb$6@dont-email.me> <vphbnb$10gus$1@dont-email.me>
	<vpivp4$1fvqe$6@dont-email.me> <vpklrk$21jn9$1@dont-email.me>
	<vplbnp$25vp2$5@dont-email.me>
	<b122ed1dc2c636321627d4dfc7936e463f920690@i2pn2.org>
	<vpltcn$28j3a$6@dont-email.me>
	<a8b150912bc326cd01c9e9ee89762d12b9fc571e@i2pn2.org>
	<vpm6hq$2dvrs$4@dont-email.me> <vpmo1m$2g3p0$3@dont-email.me>
	<vpn9m5$2jkdj$5@dont-email.me>
	<a686628c3dd1a48f5dcb8288e69758325782daa6@i2pn2.org>
	<vpoqbj$2vaf3$4@dont-email.me> <vppbmb$323f6$2@dont-email.me>
	<vpqd41$37v45$2@dont-email.me>
	<b15b2b913b3c10998fe6e8fb262882da82ea95e7@i2pn2.org>
	<vprdis$3gqpb$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 08:42:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2156415"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3654
Lines: 35

Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:20:44 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 2/27/2025 7:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 2/27/25 2:06 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott:
>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation
>>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation
>>>>>>>>> sequence long ago.
>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?
>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th
>>>>>>>> instruction, the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this
>>>>>>>> instruction,
>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH.
>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation.
>>>>> I say what the correct simulation is.
>>>>> You say that I am wrong.
>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist.
>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is.
>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question:
>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH?
>> PROBLEM BLOWS UP as the value of memory 000015c3 isn't specified as
>> part
> When you are told that this address specifies an x86 emulator then
> disagreement is incorrect.
Let's naively assume it doesn't produce any side effects. Then it depends
on the return value.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.