Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<d0be5ca5054bb07de26f5d86274ce629@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Albert in Relativityland
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 18:25:53 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <d0be5ca5054bb07de26f5d86274ce629@www.novabbs.com>
References: <3ce0bf632f46843f8cc0a3f45fdc0acd@www.novabbs.com> <vshcgq$3ojsg$3@dont-email.me> <795a3195162645246d7e9e786d2036ff@www.novabbs.com> <vsiuqq$1bsmo$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2849583"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$7QNSpLGRmHh4hql7fHyYaesxSXTAus3YriF4QWPG60YBQ31901qY2
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180

On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 9:13:22 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 01.04.2025 21:28, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> Relativity is so fallacious that a person with only knowledge of
>> elementary logic and an 85 I.Q. is qualified to refute it.
>
> Is it because of your  85 I.Q. and knowledge of elementary
> logic that your comment to my statement:
>
> "The speed of muons is v = ~ 0.999668⋅c through the atmosphere
>   which also is within the laboratory with open roof."
>
> was:
>
>   "THEN, the time dilation must be the same." ?
Paul, the math does not cause time dilation. When the speed is the same
in both places, what is the cause? You have no idea.