Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<d0dcbc4036bb537e11750526e907fce1@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet.
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:04:37 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-Id: <d0dcbc4036bb537e11750526e907fce1@www.novabbs.com>
References: <00939c17919600807e3ad6527b47e74d@www.novabbs.com> <8e4d47b49b0d08a32c4d241a7bd9f85c@www.novabbs.com> <3d134676dad974fcfee511fe7270d781@www.novabbs.com> <67908532.7C80@ix.netcom.com> <19ddbd5db442cdc46b7a062e33fe27db@www.novabbs.com> <vmqtu2$11dr3$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="640458"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$n6ZUew9VNzNx70z094EPDunrZKKmmt6SJFFtYmvdlClkUdWFqaFHS
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2324
Lines: 23

On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:07:23 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 22.01.2025 07:09, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> Thank you, but the refraction of sunlight that keeps the Sun visible
>> after astronomical sunset and the bending of starlight during an eclipse
>> are not perspectival or illusions.
>
> Have you still not learned the difference between
> refraction and gravitational deflection, Laurence?
>
> Do you remember that you made fool of yourself when
> you claimed that Poor said that Einstein's equation
> was "a refraction formula"?
> What Poor said was:
> "The mathematical formula, by which Einstein calculated his
>   deflection of 1.75 seconds for light rays passing the edge
>   of the sun, is a well known and simple formula of physical optics"
>
> The equation Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² is a gravitational deflection formula,
> but since you think it is "a refraction formula" you can
> try to use it to explain why the Sun is seen above the horizon
> when it really is below it. Good luck! :-D
Einstein claimed to have gotten the doubling by using Huygens's
principle, which is about refraction.