Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<d0f54a27901be901d74e6282d1036b08@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: The HOAX of =?UTF-8?B?RT1tY8KyLiBEb2N1bWVudGVkIGhpc3Rvcnkgc2luY2UgMTg5?= =?UTF-8?B?OC4=?= Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 01:27:01 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <d0f54a27901be901d74e6282d1036b08@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3398319"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$xnU8dqM3ZzN4ZkJWAMMsl.Eri1I9qqGx3u03Oc/tQfkt.YuPp045y X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939 Bytes: 3774 Lines: 80 That there was a relationship between energy and mass was suspected since the last years of XIX century. By 1899, Poincaré derived such a relationship by using a thought experiment with a "light cannon" and its recoil, once it shot a pulse of light. By equating the energy of the light pulse and the recoil of such a cannon, it lead him to attribute to electromagnetic radiation a mass equal to E/c² where E is the total energy of the radiation. https://www.bjp-bg.com/papers/bjp2019_2_081-093.pdf But Thomson, Lorentz, Heaviside and many others were closing the approach to this concept by using measurements of the recently discovered electron. This was known by 1900 (values in c.g.s. system): 1. (Lorentz and others): Energy of an electron at rest E = e²/R 2. Charge e (Planck 1900): e = 4.69E-10 esu (g^1/2 cm^3/2 s^-1) 3. Ratio e/m (Thomson 1900): e/m = 6.32766E+17 esu/g OR m/e = 1.58036E-18 g/esu 4. Mass of electron (1900): m = (m/e) e = 7.4119E-28 g 5. Radius of an electron (1907, Rutherford, others): R = 1.11E-14 cm 6. Energy stored in an electron (1907): E = 1.976E-05 erg or g.cm²/s² 1 erg = 6.2400E+11 eV So, E = 12.329 MeV, by 1907. ******** ENTER RELATIVITY AND E = mc² ****************** Now, the history IS BEING RE-WRITTEN, because E = 0.511 MeV IN WHAT WAY HISTORY IS RE-WRITTEN BY RELATIVISTS (SINCE WWII)? They INVENTED the "classic radius of an electron", Rc = 2.8179403227E-15 m (NIST and other agencies), IN ORDER TO EQUATE NON-RELATIVISTIC ENERGY WITH E = mc². In this FRAUDULENT WAY, AND ONLY BY CONSENSUS BETWEEN RELATIVISTS, IT WAS POSSIBLE TO ACHIEVE WHAT WAS INCREDIBLE: PRE-RELATIVITY VALUES = POST-RELATIVITY VALUES. So, with electrons, for the last 80 years WAS FIXED THAT E = e²/R = mc² (c.g.s. system). And this HOAX was completed by ERASING FROM NIST the radius of protons (also neutrons). That presence COMPLICATED THE HOAX, so they censured it. You can check at NIST. EVEN WORSE: the actual radius of electrons have been measured recently as being about 10E-18 m, but THIS put the pre-relativistic energy of an electron about 1,000 times HIGHER than what E = mc² gives. And other experiments, in the last 50 years, have "measured" the electron's radius as low as 10E-21 m OR LOWER. Actually, besides this primary HOAX in relativity, modern physicists don't have a fucking idea of what the radius is. What is certain is that, in QED and since 1946, Feynman and many others solved the problem of INFINITIES (as radius of charged particles got lower and lower) by RENORMALIZATION, which is more or less to replace the points in QED that diverge to infinity by a given number (ad-hoc). As Feynman said: IT WORKS. NOW SHUT UP AND CALCULATE! This is what physics has become: A DISGUSTING FARCE.