Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<d2bd62444d18cd6ef2d3148b7b9239d8@www.novabbs.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture
 =?UTF-8?B?ZGVzaWduZXI/?=
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 22:07:42 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <d2bd62444d18cd6ef2d3148b7b9239d8@www.novabbs.org>
References: <memo.20240913205156.19028s@jgd.cix.co.uk> <vcd3ds$3o6ae$2@dont-email.me> <2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org> <2024Sep18.074007@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vcds4i$3vato$1@dont-email.me> <2024Sep18.220953@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vcfopr$8glq$3@dont-email.me> <ll232oFs6asU1@mid.individual.net> <vcgr9d$gndp$2@dont-email.me> <vch06v$hq45$1@dont-email.me> <vci30n$n38u$4@dont-email.me> <ll3lmnF5eg1U1@mid.individual.net> <vckq4h$18k7r$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2814553"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$JFu0.5WrnRLJKJ.a6pWyqO/868a8Ho88JPPuWbIrl6MyYtsego3C.
Bytes: 2217
Lines: 20

On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:40:33 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:08:23 +0300, Niklas Holsti wrote:
>
>> If you can back up that claim (that noise in quantum computing comes
>> from "many worlds") ...
>
> No, I’m saying the opposite: the noise comes from the fact that “many
> worlds” is nonsense.

There are many kinds of noise and the presence of noise is part of
our world with very little needing quantum mechanics to be visible.

The Casimir effect measures quantum noise in a <hard> vacuum
caused by virtual particles.

Then there is a noise of amplification, a noise of sampling, a noise
related to the movement of atoms (heat), Brownian motion, and on and on.

All of these noise sources will remain even if the many-world
theory collapses and dies (low probability).