Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 21:27:31 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org> References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <8d69d6cd-76bc-4dc1-894e-709d044e68a1@att.net> <vjst0u$1tqvv$3@dont-email.me> <7356267c-491b-45c2-b86a-d40c45dfa40c@att.net> <vjufr6$29khr$3@dont-email.me> <4bf8a77e-4b2a-471f-9075-0b063098153f@att.net> <vjv6uv$2dra0$1@dont-email.me> <31180d7e-1c2b-4e2b-b8d6-e3e62f05da43@att.net> <vk1brk$2srss$7@dont-email.me> <bb80c6c5-04c0-4e2d-bb21-ac51aab9e252@att.net> <vk23m7$31l8v$1@dont-email.me> <bce1b27d-170c-4385-8938-36805c983c49@att.net> <vk693m$f52$2@dont-email.me> <a17eb8b6-7d11-4c59-b98c-b4d5de8358ca@att.net> <vk7dmb$7mh2$2@dont-email.me> <b72490c1-e61a-4c23-a3a5-f624b2c084e4@att.net> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me> <bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net> <vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me> <c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net> <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me> <3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org> <vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 21:27:31 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="987681"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2999 Lines: 21 Am Sun, 29 Dec 2024 11:39:22 +0100 schrieb WM: > On 28.12.2024 18:48, joes wrote: >> Am Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:50:49 +0100 schrieb WM: > >>> A good example is the set of FISONs. Every FISON contains only a >>> negligible quantity of natural numbers. A generous estimation is: >>> Every FISON contains less than 1 % of all natural numbers. There is no >>> FISON that contains more than 1 %. Therefore the union of all FISONs >>> contains less than 1 % of all natural numbers. Outside of the union of >>> FISONs are almost all natural numbers. >> A relative size is useless because it is still exactly as infinite, >> i.e. countable. You seem to think there are only finitely many naturals >> and therefore FISes. Of course, if you only consider fin. many, you >> don’t have all. > A relative size is very useful in order to correct the fantasy claim > that the union of all FISONs covers the infinite gap between all FISONs > and ω. There is no gap. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.