Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<d5ff3d75fcbd66ed75930e3b351bc885@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article. Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 23:10:23 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <d5ff3d75fcbd66ed75930e3b351bc885@www.novabbs.com> References: <db18709b6ba689b9c07245000ff1b094@www.novabbs.com> <53a754e33f8216df2e7882aa63ee8391@www.novabbs.com> <511c68d28f959e6fc1f6e64452fd415d@www.novabbs.com> <6718b186$0$532$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <be287e10cd90f0cbfd70c711873fcea4@www.novabbs.com> <2cbcea74010d65879416d2d1aed4a84b@www.novabbs.com> <ab86444ec806e48f140fd4f40ae3d7f1@www.novabbs.com> <a565a043054152d727f9dbbdd131cddd@www.novabbs.com> <b16549f31a5f9627f2b4a922ea11f872@www.novabbs.com> <509ee3cdf4e3f46de144f88c115fce2b@www.novabbs.com> <9d4409794456d76d2340a3e0e2061e8c@www.novabbs.com> <7766caa54c664f912eb2f5673ab3bc48@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3670686"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$O44Bm602nwyL.SNV38Oo7OQfX7n3zCPDXY/dtxgirlyNUbTYu2BrC Bytes: 1765 Lines: 3 Mr. Hertz: Yes, the 43" is within the margin of error for Newtonian methods. All that is necessary is refining those as Smulsky does. There's the oblateness, the Sun's axial spin, and the barycenter orbit to account for that, so it should suffice easily.