| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<d6400c2feb16137ebfde1a7d67752217f1ec6016@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 17:20:10 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <d6400c2feb16137ebfde1a7d67752217f1ec6016@i2pn2.org> References: <vmo1bs$1rnl$1@dont-email.me> <ee4e189d-56bc-4ed7-b7b7-cd71fc4d2349@att.net> <vmqh9k$urua$1@dont-email.me> <903de8e1-3538-4cfe-9f7a-6509eda47ab6@att.net> <vmsvfv$1hn5k$1@dont-email.me> <3844edd7-0750-4418-bff6-2759817446b3@att.net> <vmvn1h$25r19$1@dont-email.me> <27377646-137a-4f8f-a7bb-a75707b2da96@att.net> <vn2gcf$2ouuo$2@dont-email.me> <965ee9868f28953d437113d0d38f069815499a3f@i2pn2.org> <vn4sfi$3ijdb$2@dont-email.me> <e51fcde5622ccc6beab7882831e5f7033c04d150@i2pn2.org> <vn5gur$3qu1c$3@dont-email.me> <77fb6230f3ef78f7524b70785c4772313e238258@i2pn2.org> <vn7r2r$q7sl$2@dont-email.me> <814297ada299a65bb9f427ddec5646afcc94be9f@i2pn2.org> <vn85es$u7pk$2@dont-email.me> <vn88di$10e3c$1@dont-email.me> <vna60d$1ng1k$1@dont-email.me> <0611fe6c9a37a967e9cfcf9741d139c17c494435@i2pn2.org> <vnl7vg$3ae6$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 17:20:10 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2206937"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2091 Lines: 11 Am Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:35:44 +0100 schrieb WM: > On 31.01.2025 19:32, joes wrote: >> Am Tue, 28 Jan 2025 09:54:38 +0100 schrieb WM: > >>> Here we talk about FISONs. >> Yeah, sets of FISONs have a first element. > Unfortunately no set satisfying U(A(n)) = ℕ has no first element. True. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.