Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<d681d05a13efbbec45fbb5ed7f705f8f@www.novabbs.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Continuations Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 20:34:22 +0000 Organization: Rocksolid Light Message-ID: <d681d05a13efbbec45fbb5ed7f705f8f@www.novabbs.org> References: <v6tbki$3g9rg$1@dont-email.me> <47689j5gbdg2runh3t7oq2thodmfkalno6@4ax.com> <v71vqu$gomv$9@dont-email.me> <116d9j5651mtjmq4bkjaheuf0pgpu6p0m8@4ax.com> <f8c6c5b5863ecfc1ad45bb415f0d2b49@www.novabbs.org> <7u7e9j5dthm94vb2vdsugngjf1cafhu2i4@4ax.com> <0f7b4deb1761f4c485d1dc3b21eb7cb3@www.novabbs.org> <v78soj$1tn73$1@dont-email.me> <v7dsf2$3139m$1@dont-email.me> <v7dtvf$313uu$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3864455"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$NeJ8v6iWAna8LHHBzd82COoZ87Gfj0o/P7oKynGs/7SbVOLf2AS3a X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8 Bytes: 1836 Lines: 19 On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 14:41:52 +0000, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> schrieb: >> >> >> I'm guessing that you would do the exp(-E_a/(R*T)) as >> exp(-E-a)-exp(R*T), since that should give the same result and now you >> could interleave the two exp) calculations, and/or hoist the exp(-E_a) >> term? > > I don't think that formula is correct. It is not:: exp(x+y) = exp(x)×exp(y) so add/subtract can be simplified, but multiply and divide cannot (easily). Now, if we were dealing with Ln() those multiplies and divides can be simplified.