Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: What is "local =?UTF-8?B?dGltZSI/?=
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:42:04 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <d7345b9dea0b2130ca019fd48f5723b4@www.novabbs.com>
References: <M0ZS0z9of5m3zPojotZe3TGunn4@jntp> <0b18524a059027e24f86429ab82cfff3@www.novabbs.com> <1801b5d314856682$72197$963880$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <702afca9d798e66d3278f4afe56697d4@www.novabbs.com> <1801b94f806fce87$71092$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <a36151f9c22d26cba9bd8ae92790e403@www.novabbs.com> <1801ee271e1007bf$86744$963880$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <4f56935998a4b88eace75825f9bf4e25@www.novabbs.com> <18023f25a0fecf93$85859$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <1a2a82a87ee63a406accf45d2754152b@www.novabbs.com> <18028bfe050dac11$154418$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <ea0ad46133cce6cd3f8c3ca8cca6a5b8@www.novabbs.com> <1802a7f0c6571184$206767$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <e06a25b84c50477487d38d89b17d8cf0@www.novabbs.com> <1802b151648137d9$238674$945036$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="936"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Elsxm6/J25suQFVo4yuKr.uQoun8zzMAJztZJccOY8JqCkTT/QtFi
Bytes: 5348
Lines: 104

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:29:29 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 28.10.2024 o 18:49, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:37:38 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > W dniu 28.10.2024 o 13:24, gharnagel pisze:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 7:05:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Still, J've shown you about 40 examples of a time which
> > > > > are  obviously a human invention.
> > > >
> > > > Irrelevant.  It takes only ONE valid example to the contrary
> > > > to refute the assertion
> > >
> > > And providing 40 I surely did an overkill
> > > of your babbling of time being a part of
> > > nature and dilating.
> >
> > I said nothing about dilating.
>
> Really? Didn't you say that time is dilating?

Not in this discussion, which has NOTHING to do with relativity.
Wozniak is trying to change the subject because he knows that
his assertion that time purely a human invention has been refuted.

> Well, isn't it, poor trash?

See?  He is "crafty and mean.  But not creative, not truly
intelligent." -- Robert A. Heinlein

> > Wozniak keeps trying to insert relativity into a topic that
> > has nothing to do with relativity.
>
> Even amongst many idiocies you said in this and
> other threads - this one is rather amazing.

Wozniak keeps trying to deflect from the fact that his
vacuous assertion has been refuted.  He tries to create
an argument merely for the sake of argument.  He's getting
to be soporifically boring.

> > > > "a: the measured or measurable period during which an
> > > > action, process, or condition exists or continues"
> > >
> > > Well, 40 of mine examples fit here, you've presented
> > > no example fitting and being a part of nature.
> >
> > A "measurable period" does not prove that the "period"
> > is a human invention.  Wozniak is grasping at straws.
>
> Well, if  it's an outcome of a human invented procedure...

It's not.  It's an observation of nature.

> anyway, you may use any of the times
> - human inventions here and it's going to fit.

It doesn't "fit."  Wozniak is being deceitful.

> How did you imagine that it's describing
> something that isn't a human invention?

How does Wozniak think (and I use that word very loosely
in his case) that a period of time (like, the period of
time from sunrise to sunset) is a human invention and
not a natural process?

> > > Well, from 40 of mine examples not every one fits
> > > here (UTC and zone times are almoust continous, but
> > > not quite) but many do. You've presented
> > > no example fitting and being a part of nature.
> >
> > So Wozniak that "time is a nonspatial continuum" means
> > that humans created time and space.
>
> They created at least 40 different times and a lot
> more of different spaces.

They didn't create time and space.  Wozniak's assertion
is refuted.

> > > Asserting about someone's booze with no
> > > other reason but disliking him - absolutely
> > > is.
> >
> > Woznial insists on being dead wrong even when he's proven
> > dead wrong:
>
> And Harnagel go for slandering in such case.

What I said is a perfectly logical conclusion from Wozniak's
words and behavior.  If he doesn't like it, he can always
change.

> That's what The Shit's doggies are trained
> for.

My, my!  Coprophilia again.  His brain is really messed up.
He must be a very lonely, needy soul, trying to hang onto a
dead, refuted claim so someone will acknowledge his existence.
Well, this is getting very boring.  Wozniak's continually
spouts baloney so it's time for him to go pound sand.