| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<d7d5057eda64a5a3280ee30f2e421d54@www.novabbs.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 23:04:13 +0000 Organization: Rocksolid Light Message-ID: <d7d5057eda64a5a3280ee30f2e421d54@www.novabbs.org> References: <29ddba74afd0cdddbd9fbef17243485e@www.novabbs.com> <vqii28$brqv$1@dont-email.me> <vqjo8h$lsno$1@dont-email.me> <63773432e96ef6c23cef09a2c2ccdae9@www.novabbs.org> <54838740bd0a95a0a205880c413bd4f4@www.novabbs.com> <aa3d159505224b2cfd66f7d08772a887@www.novabbs.org> <1c711c71c6033d0cc64a5603c41a4cf6@www.novabbs.com> <vqtf3o$2tvgm$1@dont-email.me> <67d2928f$0$5202$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <372c6de7f162e459f9fb40b81ce6c5bb@www.novabbs.org> <47eebl-kcb5.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2457969"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="8Ljlg8xw5cAHatvjdHGGjEHKUx9ddlqxMwQzk4UFm4k"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: d6bc49351b0faa08a25d2b434d815198335a8b45 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$mDcqswEWcV8YUs7qG8rqyuZlMXa4R1.x0kaTubuexLYdeum4VFi.2 Bytes: 3894 Lines: 69 On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 23:12:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 8:08:49 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> >>> Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 13/03/25 03:21, jerryfriedman wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:55:47 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote: >>>> >>>>>> When we say tire pressure is so much, that means there is so much >>>>>> force acting normally on the tire wall per square inch. >>>>> >>>>> That's true. The magnitude of the force is given by the pressure and >>>>> the area, both scalars, and the direction of the force vector is >>>>> normal to the tire wall. >>>> >>>> Something that I forgot to mention. >>>> >>>> Although all of the above is true, it talks only about the force on the >>>> wall. There is also pressure all the way through the interior of the >>>> tyre. >>>> >>>> In what direction is that pressure acting? If we accept that pressure is >>>> a scalar, there is nothing more to explain. If it's a vector, then away >>>> from the walls it is acting in all directions, which is at least a >>>> little weird. >>> >>> Actually it is a tensor, >>> which may reduce to a scalar under suitable circumstances, >> >> Like trying to prove certain wrong theories. Immense gravitational >> pressure existing (despite gravitational zero force) at the centre of >> the Sun to create fusion for solar energy! > > Since you have no education in nuclear physics Arindam has in his possession a textbook on nuclear physics by Kaplan. Heavy reliance on the e=mcc crap here to justify the nucleus protons. Whereas they are simply held together by electrons. So fundamentally wrong. and zero experimental > information on the subject, Wrong Arindam found in 2005 that the Michelson Morley interferometer experiment showed that the results actually showed that light speed varied with the emitter. That knocked out the basis for e=mcc. He then violated inertia with his rail gun experiments. Thus proving his physics correct. what leads you to believe you know anything > about the subject, Arindam? Arindam being the greatest genius of all time just does what he does, following Divine inspiration. He cares nothing for silly questions. Especially from smartypants atheists with science pretensions. Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor > > Of course I mean other than your insanity? --