Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<d921df64d59a0bcdd17b4df10452e1b80df52a63@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 22:13:04 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <d921df64d59a0bcdd17b4df10452e1b80df52a63@i2pn2.org>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <va4h96$3r7nv$1@dont-email.me>
 <H5iV5HXUBwUzWtVKRZj7h4N2LdA@jntp> <va543m$3u6dp$1@dont-email.me>
 <kN73KZJabPuiasJJ0DR6UOOrMHE@jntp>
 <d47ad77b3f2bd0bc6280b8eca772b280f3a18dc8@i2pn2.org>
 <ivRRwss8WgoMTIfJa5g04TJmRxU@jntp>
 <db885c7c1e1a5bfdf60e90fa9882bfb73b4e6ce7@i2pn2.org>
 <eY2Memk56jLKsrTeR3kBDQQqfHI@jntp>
 <bdfbb725-7fc3-4e17-b09b-4d6191d301a5@att.net>
 <tvUGDEKZBjBIOn4R0HIJvG5es4k@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 02:13:05 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4162070"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <tvUGDEKZBjBIOn4R0HIJvG5es4k@jntp>
Bytes: 2100
Lines: 26

On 8/27/24 3:11 PM, WM wrote:
> Le 27/08/2024 à 02:06, Jim Burns a écrit :
>> On 8/25/2024 3:45 PM, WM wrote:
> 
>>> This function exists because
>>> nothing contradicts its existence.
>>
>> Except for the contradicting consequences of
>> its existence.
> 
> The function exists if actual infinity exists.
> The function does not exist if only potential infinity exists.
> 
>> ¬∃ᴿx>0: NUF(x) = 1
> 
> Then NUF(x) does not exist and infinity is not actual and sets are not 
> complete.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 
> 

Well NUF(x) does not exist, but that doesn't say that infiity is not 
actual, or that sets are not complete, just that your logic can't handle it.

Your IGNORANCE doesn't prove that something can't exist for people who 
can actually think.