Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<d97ce95ab4df99cf720a18e95039b2a1@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Einstein far worse than Lysenko
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:00:40 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <d97ce95ab4df99cf720a18e95039b2a1@www.novabbs.com>
References: <bf312972bad8fe75db3671116a748669@www.novabbs.com> <vdch6p$1stta$1@dont-email.me> <27af7a4f4edce11bc756043f1ebb1acf@www.novabbs.com> <vftsgp$3soar$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="200510"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$jUQSr6ntRa9NBJn2Vl57wekkOo45gYBLeVPBqFcRN/nmq2Is7dO1u
Bytes: 2023
Lines: 29

On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:05:13 +0000, David Canzi wrote:

> On 9/29/24 18:04, bertietaylor wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 21:35:21 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/28/24 20:00, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>> The damage Lysenko did was confined to Communist countries. And
>>>> repaired.
>>>
>>> You can't "repair" megadeaths.
>>
>> You can try to make all deaths happen after fruitful and long lives
>> lived in joy.
>
> This doesn't repair the damage.  The people who died because
> of Lysenko remain dead.
>
> How many people died because of Lysenko's theories?
>
> How many people died because of Einstein's theories?

Deaths aren't everything. Global suffering caused by extraordinary
inequalities arising from wrong physics has been on and ongoing with
wrong Einsteinian physics and horrid stupid scientific leadership. Like
weeds choking growth of desired plants. Like bad money driving out good
money.


>
> (The answer to the second question is not 0.)