Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious =?UTF-8?B?QmF1Ymxlcz8=?=
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 11:13:25 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <d99e74594656f73f25f70a5b690b90f2@www.novabbs.com>
References: <266e4dcf4bee1d0100c5716c04f2e786@www.novabbs.com> <679284FD.3ABB@ix.netcom.com> <67a111c1cd4ba39ca41fe660200ecadf@www.novabbs.com> <5e7fc5f52bd5693fabce0060ee8b91df@www.novabbs.com> <vmufi5$1r9fi$1@dont-email.me> <50d67245623f6116d399ab3a0a503fa7@www.novabbs.com> <vn1bse$2fn29$2@dont-email.me> <77bc025d62d66c76382529a996618f1b@www.novabbs.com> <GoDQLHRLhTM5HdTB9re7zXIA6qI@jntp> <181e0def99a3765e$15257$1433769$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <HLJ_xLCVFcgkbJ2hsew_iF1zqOo@jntp> <181e0fdb6f4f1ece$12971$1427260$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <fi825AoqCg5o9Go62CoY2LUf5e0@jntp> <679e9ffb$1$16838$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <182053d90cea3f81$15298$1433769$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <679f4b57$1$29717$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2320206"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$OeQ3ZYIdTV7GnCa5aIE/xOycm/Edp.IDIX1oEc9Q.kxKbGJHrUrbm
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
Bytes: 3068
Lines: 43

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 10:39:19 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> W dniu 01.02.2025 o 23:28, J. J. Lodder pisze:
>>
>>>>>> Nobody is "rejecting Euclid"
>>>>>
>>>>> A lie. Of course.
>>>>
>>>> Because you say so? I checked: nobody is "rejecting Euclid".
>>>
>>> Indeed, and au contraire:
>>
>>> Nowadays Euclidean geometry is -defined- as that kind of geometry
>>> in which the Pythagorean theorem holds.
>>
>> And - according to the teachings of your moronic church -
>> does  Pythagorean theorem hold? For real?
>> Poor stinker Python has never answerred, he's always
>> dodging and changing the subject. How about you?
>
> You might have noticed that I make it a habit
> of never replying to your silly rants.
> I'll make an exception for once,
> because you are trying to mislead the innocent kiddies
> who might stray in here.
>
> Of course the Pythagorean theorem holds -in Euclidean geometry-.
> A forteriori, it -defines- Euclidean geometry, nowadays.

The Pythagoras theorem is just that. Euclidean geometry is defined by
axioms or self-evident and unquestionable truths upon which all theorems
are derived. Not the other way around.
>
> It does of course not hold in any other kind of geometry,
> by definition,

All other geometries are mappings based on Euclidean geometry, if we are
talking engineering sense.


>
> Jan