Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 23:34:03 +0000
Subject: Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <f0f05bc7729633ba2967b3c10ca46e58@www.novabbs.com>
 <v5r9fa$f8rc$1@dont-email.me> <6681bcfe$0$11694$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
 <f61757a3e454e14d464bd4e396ba9a32@www.novabbs.com>
 <ZGDgO.475412$IG21.213529@fx15.ams4>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:34:05 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ZGDgO.475412$IG21.213529@fx15.ams4>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <dPmcnb8VK_Z2oR77nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 29
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Jueu9wGUGbfUjtJmCCROZS1vhNi73fDcR1b2ZoVf7b0DGK/Pa5F4/wek0bZ8JQ4ZDnXw34YVEbWJwG7!Z1KuzrzELXJcyQ6Nr/7R7fmeUR+WRpEmvm24WGD5DNEP1bh4c6bhWUFqaB50k2R1e0YXi5qACw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2283

On 07/01/2024 12:49 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> Den 30.06.2024 23:42, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> Light is not affected by gravity.
>
>
> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/GravDeflection.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf
> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf
>
> There is no way you can claim to be ignorant of
> the fact that light is deflected when it passes
> massive objects like stars.
>
> Don't you understand how stupid it is to claim what
> is proved false?
>
>

In fact the Arago spot shows that light is deflected
as if it's omni-directional, yet geometric, and optical.

An idea of a "Fresnel large lensing" can go together
with helping explain that Newton's Mercury precession
was off and Einstein's Mercury precession was only
half off and why it's on.