Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <dWSv5ZMMRvLC9WJtwFAZ6cvq5hM@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic synchronisation method
References: <4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp> <HQFxpJvcwIpLhNIeMKqLNQ292YE@jntp> <vk9qtr$p308$1@dont-email.me>
 <6s8YJGP42H0C-4FoL8dk0ahw7GU@jntp> <vkrfq7$vgn7$1@dont-email.me> <aPHxGjD_dpkbBzSp5qyOiHozthM@jntp>
 <vkv0i5$1pqpi$1@dont-email.me> <_CYXv7AxHmksXdC3qC_LVC1ERDY@jntp> <vl0g4p$26cgn$2@dont-email.me>
 <18163cd885ff83d7$35987$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: qiLvPEXluu8UNEatHXFb2_gHFnk
JNTP-ThreadID: YYnLTqUhhEGH779uk7wevDN2vH4
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=dWSv5ZMMRvLC9WJtwFAZ6cvq5hM@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 24 11:26:10 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-12-31T11:26:10Z/9158564"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 3744
Lines: 38

Le 31/12/2024 à 11:40, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> 
> And you may be absolutely sure it's never
> going to show "local time" absurd invented
> by your idiot guru.

Newtonian physicists (they are called cranks because they no longer exist 
in laboratories or very few) make two mistakes, where Einsteinian 
physicists only make one.
Only Dr. Hachel (that's me) does not make either of these two mistakes.
The first mistake of Newtonians is to consider that time is ubiquitous. 
They consider that when it is December 31, 2024, it is December 31, 2024 
everywhere in the universe, and that tomorrow, the entire universe will 
move to January 1, 2025. They do not understand the relativity of the 
notion of local simultaneity. They do not understand the notion of 
universal ANISOCHRONY.
Certainly, there is, at this very moment, in my hyperplane of 
simultaneity, a moment that corresponds to my present time, over there, on 
Tau Ceti (12 light-years from Earth). If I drop a marble, maybe at the 
same present moment over there, a comet has just crashed into one of the 
moons of its solar system, and I can affirm that the events were 
simultaneous (FOR ME).
But this simultaneity is mine, it is not reciprocal. An observer placed 
over there, in this inatant (for me) perceives very well that a comet has 
just crashed. But the event "my marble has just fallen to the ground" does 
not exist for him. It will only exist in 24 years (breathe, blow). And no 
one will be able to do anything about it at all. I cannot prevent my 
marble from falling, and he cannot prevent (notion of causality) that in 
his future (24 years!!!), he will perceive the fall of my marble, 24 years 
after he perceived the shock of the comet in his system.
That is the first error.
Physicists do the same, and are completely overwhelmed when I talk to them 
about it.
The second mistake of Newtonians is to consider that chronotropy (the 
measurement of time) is invariant, and does not depend on the speed of the 
frame of reference that takes the measurements. At least, since Poincaré, 
leading physicists no longer make this mistake.

R.H.