Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Gravitational red-shifting in the biggest star. What are the real
 =?UTF-8?B?Y29sb3JzPw==?=
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:49:47 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <db3ea22ecf50d4207b44eb02e3c4ba2b@www.novabbs.com>
References: <e92ea2a0a7546bace6a2ccea27d44d00@www.novabbs.com> <d53d725fd59b543ff824b3be8893ec92@www.novabbs.com> <vdbeas$1o2mt$1@dont-email.me> <cab8a6b4af78f1273c05fc1acb41bc55@www.novabbs.com> <66f99a66$1$1781$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4041537"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="hWiuCAeR3KEZYJfTvV11n0qrRi6oqW/zjvEZQQGun9A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: f685b96694175b2ad43ead343ead0a9c0082fe88
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$WIcwTlQouTKK.bxCJDEY2ex.XFWf1iV4GIPDO7QU9twJfslBlb0EK
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2691
Lines: 45

On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:20:22 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

<snip>

> Reading isn't your strongest point, is it?
> By Wikipedia, the best mass estimate is smaller than 10 solar masses,
> with a radius probably extending beyond Mars.
> This implies a negligeable gravitational red shift,
> so the answer to your question is: red, red, and red,
>
> Jan


i'm very good at reading and I'm confident about people extracting the
correct information from the links I post. I don't censure anything.

It's you who sucks when you "cherry-pick" data, and also sucks being
sarcastic, old prune.

ONE MORE TIME, I EXTRACT THIS PART. BE HONEST:


From Wikipedia, two different values for mass and a remarkable "MASS IS
UNKNOWN":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UY_Scuti

The luminosity is then calculated to be 340,000 L☉ at an effective
temperature of 3,365±134 K, giving an initial mass of 25 M☉ (possibly up
to 40 M☉ for a non-rotating star).[4]
......

UY Scuti has no known companion star and so its mass is uncertain.
However, it is expected on theoretical grounds to be between 7 and 10
M☉.[4]

***********************

7, 10, 25, 1,000 M☉. Rela-astrophysicists DON'T HAVE A CLUE!

Aren't they in the club that affirm that baryonic matter in the Universe
accounts for only 5% of what BBT/GR requires?

And these geniuses try to calculate mass by using luminosity and 150
years old formulae. Theoretical astrophysics IS AN ABSOLUTE JOKE, since
the times of Stefan, later with Eddington.