Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 03:50:30 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <dd109397687b2f8e74c3e1e3d826772db8b65e40@i2pn2.org>
References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me> <v60dci$1ib5p$1@dont-email.me>
	<v60red$1kr1q$2@dont-email.me> <v61hn7$1oec9$1@dont-email.me>
	<v61ipa$1og2o$2@dont-email.me> <v61jod$1oec9$2@dont-email.me>
	<v61leu$1p1uo$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 03:50:30 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1973946"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2803
Lines: 40

Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:46:38 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 7/2/2024 2:17 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 02.jul.2024 om 21:00 schreef olcott:
>>> On 7/2/2024 1:42 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 02.jul.2024 om 14:22 schreef olcott:
>>>>> On 7/2/2024 3:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>> Op 02.jul.2024 om 03:25 schreef olcott:

>>>>>>> Every C programmer that knows what an x86 emulator is knows that
>>>>>>> when HHH emulates the machine language of Infinite_Loop,
>>>>>>> Infinite_Recursion, and DDD that it must abort these emulations so
>>>>>>> that itself can terminate normally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whether or not it *must* abort is not very relevant.
>>>>>
>>>>> This <is> the problem that I am willing to discuss.
>>>>> I am unwilling to discuss any other problem.
>>>>> This does meet the Sipser approved criteria.

>>>> Repeating the same thing that has already been proved to be
>>>> irrelevant does not bring the discussion any further.
>>>> Sipser is not relevant, because that is about a correct simulation.
>>>> Your simulation is not correct.
>>>>
>>> If you disagree with this you are either dishonest or clueless I no
>>> longer care which one.

>>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an emulated HHH(DDD) to
>>> repeat the process until aborted.
>> 
>> HHH repeats the process twice and aborts too soon.
> 
> You are freaking thinking too damn narrow minded.
> DDD is correctly emulated by any HHH that can exist which calls this
> emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted (which may be
> never).
Whatever HHH does, it does not run forever but aborts.

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.