Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Humans can't observe time. Even less, the pass of time. Science is an
 illusion.
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:44:02 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <de3ee3a7a1c716864de364e3605360f6@www.novabbs.com>
References: <97a9ca22ce4629abfc7c47ee82530394@www.novabbs.com> <vub9pk$deva$1@solani.org> <43ad1dfea5faf1f126cb596c0c01bc01@www.novabbs.com> <vubkrm$dd0n$3@solani.org> <77da0cb1139c278520ee46501f6368a3@www.novabbs.com> <vueu9p$312jv$1@dont-email.me> <a2928364f0fcdf2a4422c464becf49e0@www.novabbs.com> <vuk3do$heno$3@solani.org> <01d18d927e1bb35d7daec6502509f2e1@www.novabbs.com> <vum59e$1k37h$1@dont-email.me> <9464a55dd07276d5a9aad9bd8e42c080@www.novabbs.com> <0fe7a71798dcb51727db0f2e61f87988@www.novabbs.com> <vunna0$33d14$1@dont-email.me> <0460cbd0eea08e7c3b0e7bd7170d76f4@www.novabbs.com> <2d33b3670e50f8eccf7f9551837c1fc0@www.novabbs.com> <vup1ad$bdap$1@dont-email.me> <e6d7102f5bcb30031c7609ff114d4c76@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2393499"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$BEbdXGr20.IsQhkztohJGe/AyI1IbyK7C1PaBLPWGDEynjJd/v3Fe
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2636
Lines: 26

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 1:06:40 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>
> [boring irrelevant repetition deleted]
>
> So, WE CAN'T FEEL TIME NOR WE CAN OBSERVE THE FLOW OF TIME. No living
> specie can.

I feel it, all animals do.  They have better memories than Hertz.

> Science is an illusion,

Repeating this falsehood still doesn't make it true.  At the risk of
repeating myself, Hertz hasn't presented a logical argument for this
claim.  Science is about past knowledge, duly recorded and vetted, so
whether or not we can "observe the flow of time" is a non sequitur.

> so you are forced to believe (films, oscilloscopes, graph from
> experiments, etc.).

Organic memory is not perfect so we have such extensions.  Organic
memory is basically no different from films, graphs, drawings, texts
or silicon: it's ALL memory.

> But how do you know that such past events WERE REAL?

How does one know anything is real?  How does Hertz know HE is real?
Ask Descartes.  Cogito, ergo sum.  Duh!