Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:47:55 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
References: <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com> <v5mjv0$3cvu7$3@dont-email.me> <atropos-52908B.09075228062024@news.giganews.com> <v5mola$3dpk3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
Message-ID: <deycnSfnsKDWauP7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:47:55 +0000
Lines: 51
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Ocgs+JwebbL8pbbHGZ3L8xLMiVPJFzpdJPVqCiiLiSo1gAsnDSZvHA8TdtLOZVcUlLcdxCVh1U+NVYm!AOLYE3znh/6zL3vM8494pzs/gnucWdmzOaywai8I86IXtwhBt92gwPv7auK9GNvyhUx9+eYvG5s8
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3276
X-Original-Lines: 48

On Jun 28, 2024 at 9:33:45 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 6/28/2024 12:07 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>  In article <v5mjv0$3cvu7$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>  
>>>  On 6/22/24 11:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>  FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>  On 6/22/24 11:30 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>  FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  
>>>>>>>  They decide law based on intent all the time. It's a staple of the
>>>>>>>  system.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  Cool! Let's go with intent, then. Which means all those millions of
>>>>>>  illegals pretending to be refugees and just reciting the magic words to
>>>>>>  game the system can be summarily denied and deported because the intent
>>>>>>  of the refugee law was never to allow millions of people who don't
>>>>>>  qualify as refugees to game and overwhelm the system and flood
>>>>>>  unchecked into the country.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  Regardless of what the law actually says, its intent was never to
>>>>>>  create the current border crisis we're currently experiencing, so we
>>>>>>  can ignore what's written and just go with intent.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  I'm really starting to warm up to The Law According to Effa!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  What do you think the Supreme Court uses to judge whether a law is
>>>>>>>  constitutional?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  Umm... the Constitution.
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Ummm... pass the border bill your side wrote.
>>>> 
>>>>  No need. We already have the intent of the Immigration and Naturalization
>>>>  Act!
>>>> 
>>>  Then why hasn't anyone said that, besides you?
>>  
>>  Because deciding cases based on intent isn't really a thing. Something I
>>  was trying to illustrate with sarcasm.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_and_spirit_of_the_law
> 
> Gosh, it *seems* to really be a thing...

Gosh, then we're back to not needing to care about what the text of the
Immigration and Naturalization Act says, since it was unquestionably NOT the
intent of those who wrote it to erase the southern border allow the entire
Southern Hemisphere to flood into the country.