Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<df60b2aa9814ae9c389523674cdca4f9db0b474f@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (infinitary)
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:23:19 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <df60b2aa9814ae9c389523674cdca4f9db0b474f@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org>
	<4bc3b086-247a-4547-89cc-1d47f502659d@tha.de> <ve0n4i$1vps$1@news.muc.de>
	<ve10qb$1p7ge$1@dont-email.me> <ve117p$vob$1@news.muc.de>
	<ve315q$24f8f$3@dont-email.me> <ve46vu$324$2@news.muc.de>
	<ve5u2i$2jobg$4@dont-email.me> <ve6329$19d5$1@news.muc.de>
	<ve64kl$2m0nm$4@dont-email.me> <ve66f3$19d5$2@news.muc.de>
	<ve683o$6c2o$1@solani.org> <ve6a23$19d5$3@news.muc.de>
	<ve6c3b$6esq$2@solani.org> <ve6kl1$207d$1@news.muc.de>
	<ve96jj$38qui$2@dont-email.me> <ve97c7$2f64$1@news.muc.de>
	<ve97qj$38qui$4@dont-email.me>
	<3f5fcf13171337f1c3d2ef84cc149be327648451@i2pn2.org>
	<veecr3$7rap$1@dont-email.me> <veef0q$8vu4$1@dont-email.me>
	<veegng$97l4$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:23:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1680996"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2030
Lines: 11

Am Sat, 12 Oct 2024 20:55:44 +0200 schrieb WM:
> On 12.10.2024 20:26, Tom Bola wrote:
> 
>>> But the doubles are larger. Hence after doubling the set has a smaller
>>> density
>> Not with the (always) Dedekind-infinite sets
> 2n > n. That holds for all finite numbers. It halves the density.
How do you define that?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.