Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<df76d88c3e9729de443afca2c0cf99fa@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: E =?UTF-8?B?PSAzLzQgbWPCsiBvciBFID0gbWPCsj8gVGhlIGZvcmdvdHRlbiBIYXNz?= =?UTF-8?B?ZW5vaHJsIDE5MDUgd29yay4=?= Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 14:01:10 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <df76d88c3e9729de443afca2c0cf99fa@www.novabbs.com> References: <309fb33a3a66f01873fdc890e899a968@www.novabbs.com> <674BCF8E.822@ix.netcom.com> <674CCA90.3DD9@ix.netcom.com> <a89d71ab22cb1e3e279a59fe50ab5ebb@www.novabbs.com> <9f1cd556912a273a8946c77614611242@www.novabbs.com> <8a0014e4135992c8ec7bd3f2f1983164@www.novabbs.com> <d906fde3148d43d339b1663f1127216a@www.novabbs.com> <13877dcc9c6a6f2dd8056d8c05f0c661@www.novabbs.com> <a7d26012926823b22e139af8670cbbe7@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1085080"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="Ooch2ht+q3xfrepY75FKkEEx2SPWDQTvfft66HacveI"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 504a4e36a1e6a0679da537f565a179f60d7acbd8 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$ta2qlkhnoPGI/c14wAmCcOuyOaJRqZMuOug9YyFXo9YbCNqV8E986 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 1692 Lines: 6 On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 2:22:27 +0000, rhertz wrote: > Collision, collusion. Which is the difference? So, the fact that more recent measurements are significantly different from older results in that they better support E=mc^2 is de facto evidence of selective tweaking of results, fakery, and collusion?