Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<dkOdnTOBra4uDDL7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 14:35:31 +0000 Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals) Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <tR-dnU_G9dTXSjv7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2e188e21-4128-4c76-ba5d-473528262931@att.net> <NQednW9Dop2vbDr7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <7d074e06-497a-4c38-9b34-fcded370ec75@att.net> <Yz6dnZrQj9Lf3zX7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <305754ad-bf86-44e7-95a5-f6059b8869da@att.net> <78CcnZMbf6XDzjT7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <ef6e9a26-4899-41a5-ade7-5ab5a3d654d0@att.net> <SIacnYBQM_GoSjf7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <e712953f-f3a3-46bf-92e6-aea33f08cfd7@att.net> <g96dneARJ9dDfDb7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> <41684a87-685c-446c-87ce-ce2f5fdfbd4d@att.net> <h5KcnXrG7N1VsDH7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v8id14$2pfk1$1@dont-email.me> <Ah2cnYogF_UTpDD7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <b6133d70-75cc-4ad0-8755-dfa6bf9241cd@att.net> <a4KcnZKcpJT1STP7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <75fe3de0-9922-4a6e-8a4a-1df25bbc5cbc@att.net> <NPKcnRCEu-sTZzP7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <fa7974b3-69a6-4535-b227-1e69eb37bd87@att.net> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 07:36:16 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <fa7974b3-69a6-4535-b227-1e69eb37bd87@att.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <dkOdnTOBra4uDDL7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 67 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-Vc89CsWeB2JpSYvMv0yt5X3VE++37Q7JC1SO2cblmAENlDKlPQuIiFDOPsC5eMPV32uqRFNpjgb5i4J!pwvt9IslBcynWiOu/DmrF2cPcH9RP8NMVmaJ4NguotmJxy2G8U8jyc1t4FU2iFyoKTSHYGWSnYWk X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4344 On 08/03/2024 10:25 PM, Jim Burns wrote: > On 8/3/2024 11:51 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> On 08/03/2024 08:45 PM, Jim Burns wrote: >>> On 8/3/2024 9:08 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>> On 08/03/2024 12:08 PM, Jim Burns wrote: >>>>> On 8/2/2024 3:55 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>>>> On 08/02/2024 03:39 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: > >>>>>>> Then what *is* restricted comprehension? >>>>>> >>>>>> Usually it's just the antonym of >>>>>> expansion of comprehension. >>>>>> What I ask, >>>>>> if that you surpass, >>>>>> the inductive impasse, >>>>>> of the infinite super-task. >>> >>>>> I am more familiar with unrestricted comprehension >>>>> being the antonym of restricted comprehension. >>>>> >>>>> Unrestricted comprehension grants that >>>>> {x:P(x)} exists because >>>>> description P(x) of its elements exists. >>>>> >>>>> Restricted comprehension grants that >>>>> {x∈A:P(x)} exists because >>>>> description P(x) and set A exist. >>>>> >>>>> The existence of set A might have been granted >>>>> because of Restricted.Comprehension or Infinity or >>>>> Power.Set or Union or Replacement or Pairing, >>>>> but A would be logically prior to {x∈A:P(x)} >>>>> by some route. >>>> >>>> Geometry, axiomatic geometry or Euclid's, >>>> is a classical theory, and it's constructive, >>>> there's only expansion of comprehension, >>> >>> I know what comprehension, restricted.comprehension, >>> and unrestricted.comprehension are by having seen >>> set axioms which were called Comprehension, >>> Restricted.Comprehension, and Unrestricted.Comprehension. >>> >>> What does 'comprehension' mean where there are no sets? >> >> What can you think it means. > > Your rhetoric suggests that > _you_ don't have something in mind for the term > _you_ introduced, > and you'd like someone else to provide something > to have in mind. Please prove me wrong. > > What does 'comprehension' mean where there are no sets? > > Specifically, > what does 'expansion of comprehension' mean > in the context of > "geometry, axiomatic geometry or Euclid's"? > > No, "what can you think", it means. Usually it just means "construction".