Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<dkOdnTOBra4uDDL7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 14:35:31 +0000
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <tR-dnU_G9dTXSjv7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <2e188e21-4128-4c76-ba5d-473528262931@att.net>
 <NQednW9Dop2vbDr7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <7d074e06-497a-4c38-9b34-fcded370ec75@att.net>
 <Yz6dnZrQj9Lf3zX7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <305754ad-bf86-44e7-95a5-f6059b8869da@att.net>
 <78CcnZMbf6XDzjT7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <ef6e9a26-4899-41a5-ade7-5ab5a3d654d0@att.net>
 <SIacnYBQM_GoSjf7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <e712953f-f3a3-46bf-92e6-aea33f08cfd7@att.net>
 <g96dneARJ9dDfDb7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <41684a87-685c-446c-87ce-ce2f5fdfbd4d@att.net>
 <h5KcnXrG7N1VsDH7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v8id14$2pfk1$1@dont-email.me>
 <Ah2cnYogF_UTpDD7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <b6133d70-75cc-4ad0-8755-dfa6bf9241cd@att.net>
 <a4KcnZKcpJT1STP7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <75fe3de0-9922-4a6e-8a4a-1df25bbc5cbc@att.net>
 <NPKcnRCEu-sTZzP7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <fa7974b3-69a6-4535-b227-1e69eb37bd87@att.net>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 07:36:16 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fa7974b3-69a6-4535-b227-1e69eb37bd87@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <dkOdnTOBra4uDDL7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 67
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Vc89CsWeB2JpSYvMv0yt5X3VE++37Q7JC1SO2cblmAENlDKlPQuIiFDOPsC5eMPV32uqRFNpjgb5i4J!pwvt9IslBcynWiOu/DmrF2cPcH9RP8NMVmaJ4NguotmJxy2G8U8jyc1t4FU2iFyoKTSHYGWSnYWk
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4344

On 08/03/2024 10:25 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 8/3/2024 11:51 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 08/03/2024 08:45 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
>>> On 8/3/2024 9:08 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>> On 08/03/2024 12:08 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
>>>>> On 8/2/2024 3:55 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/02/2024 03:39 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Then what *is* restricted comprehension?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Usually it's just the antonym of
>>>>>> expansion of comprehension.
>>>>>> What I ask,
>>>>>> if that you surpass,
>>>>>> the inductive impasse,
>>>>>> of the infinite super-task.
>>>
>>>>> I am more familiar with unrestricted comprehension
>>>>> being the antonym of restricted comprehension.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unrestricted comprehension grants that
>>>>> {x:P(x)} exists because
>>>>> description P(x) of its elements exists.
>>>>>
>>>>> Restricted comprehension grants that
>>>>> {x∈A:P(x)} exists because
>>>>> description P(x) and set A exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> The existence of set A might have been granted
>>>>> because of Restricted.Comprehension or Infinity or
>>>>> Power.Set or Union or Replacement or Pairing,
>>>>> but A would be logically prior to {x∈A:P(x)}
>>>>> by some route.
>>>>
>>>> Geometry, axiomatic geometry or Euclid's,
>>>> is a classical theory, and it's constructive,
>>>> there's only expansion of comprehension,
>>>
>>> I know what comprehension, restricted.comprehension,
>>> and unrestricted.comprehension are by having seen
>>> set axioms which were called Comprehension,
>>> Restricted.Comprehension, and Unrestricted.Comprehension.
>>>
>>> What does 'comprehension' mean where there are no sets?
>>
>> What can you think it means.
>
> Your rhetoric suggests that
> _you_ don't have something in mind for the term
> _you_ introduced,
> and you'd like someone else to provide something
> to have in mind. Please prove me wrong.
>
> What does 'comprehension' mean where there are no sets?
>
> Specifically,
> what does 'expansion of comprehension' mean
> in the context of
> "geometry, axiomatic geometry or Euclid's"?
>
>

No, "what can you think", it means.

Usually it just means "construction".