Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <dkaF-mgapEiHixOttvsEmJzmByI@jntp>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<dkaF-mgapEiHixOttvsEmJzmByI@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <dkaF-mgapEiHixOttvsEmJzmByI@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <38ec6fd291b3b6d6f41db8be499a710a8abe39f9@i2pn2.org>
 <fE1naizk8McRI8kMur_IKqjaiuU@jntp> <e55475b3fede49578ff8924bb11ffae6bbd577f3@i2pn2.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
JNTP-HashClient: hIuWlfkNwow6QRNB5niVil-zOxM
JNTP-ThreadID: KFm3f7lT2HjaTSiMfnv5xqZoSBw
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=dkaF-mgapEiHixOttvsEmJzmByI@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 24 12:18:20 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-07-27T12:18:20Z/8965761"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Bytes: 2184
Lines: 26

Le 27/07/2024 à 13:27, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 7/27/24 7:13 AM, WM wrote:
Le 27/07/2024 à 04:23, Richard Damon a écrit :
 
By your logic, if you take a set and replace every element with a 
number that is twice that value, it would by the rule of construction 
say they must be the same size.
 
That is true in potential infinity. But I assume actual infinity.
 
 
So, what part is not true?
 
In potential infinity there is no ω.
 
Are you stating that replacing every element 
with another unique distinct element something that make the set change 
size?
 
In actual infinity the number of elements of any infinite set is fixed.
Doubling all elements of the set ℕ U ω = {1, 2, 3, ..., ω} yields the 
set
{2, 4, 6, ..., ω, ω+2, ω+4, ..., ω*2}.
 
Regards, WM