Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: transpiling to low level C
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 13:16:57 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <dshqmjlpfd451u6euort3inbfhsi5105o1@4ax.com>
References: <vjlh19$8j4k$1@dont-email.me> <vjn9g5$n0vl$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vjq5mn$1aari$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 13:16:59 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="559a30ce25ea6d2ae061a72c26d29166";
	logging-data="3140572"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19QA3sEwZf5/4IgXzfeFBdPWkQFdw3FnIo="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NV9+sNvuUj8SOJ9W1WNOG9Qv5Do=
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
Bytes: 1665

On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:22:31 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro <>
wrote:

>On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 20:08:53 +0100, Bonita Montero wrote:
>
>> C++ is more readable because is is magnitudes more expressive than C.

my position is all is based from the more easy instructions both for
cpu and human, if goto

someone says that is better ifcall, but for me is not much readable,
it is worse than ifgoto 

>And it is certainly more surprising than C. Often unpleasantly so.
>
>> You can easily write a C++-statement that would hunddres of lines in C
>
>Yes, but *which* hundreds of lines, exactly, would be the correct C 
>equivalent?