Path: ...!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 18:22:35 +0000
Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp>
 <ljfrjfF3hr1U1@mid.individual.net> <IqoVDZIyxVoLReItZ3sD4aYyQ64@jntp>
 <vavtbs$14qma$1@dont-email.me> <pheofpwVPcOT3RCuNcESEqS47x0@jntp>
 <vb1dpe$1evqr$1@dont-email.me> <NVcS6uZDkN8UGhkdIwwkCs4R7x8@jntp>
 <vb1mk4$1g551$1@dont-email.me> <siZVeXFhx1b-RHNvgyKaFJEz2Sc@jntp>
 <vb27p9$1i5d6$1@dont-email.me> <vWfLvh8Z8vhNLMZ2a6tDPPujI6Q@jntp>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 11:22:41 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vWfLvh8Z8vhNLMZ2a6tDPPujI6Q@jntp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <dt-dndfM2M12LUn7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 41
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-skTYDURK3o6P7HuJFzx0xLVaJJfUrzlhbIeipIw941Eake9f/88rRHq93mw9PG2HMnkwc5B8EAwTU5q!JsSG2YG0yS71a+24hwumRSjbv9RPc0d1vJ20vz4vbGGDqnodz1OLfr3l7z6NdNVyxaOeNdMlYsEV!Bg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2533

On 09/01/2024 10:38 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
> Le 01/09/2024 à 19:20, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>> Den 01.09.2024 16:13, skrev Richard Hachel:
>
>> Why didn't you calculate  calculate t₂ with the wrong speed of light?
>> Is the equation t₂ = (d/v)⋅√(1−v²/c²) beyond your mathematical
>> capabilities?
>
> Vr=Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
>
> Vr=4c/3
>
> t₂=x/Vr=0.75sec
>
> R.H.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yet, if you square that, then take the root,
is it not that triangle inequality replaces 0.25?

The difference?


This is a large part of when things are squared
or stored in roots for no reason then as with
regards to that as an indicator, or "dimension",
where a "dimension" only needs one bit an "indicator",
triangle rule the bit indicator for the quadrant,
that in these things making numerical emergence
for continuity, it's often the most usual rule
any matters of direction, "what 0.75 means".

It's like "power law" or "normal distribution",
"sure, it fits".