Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<duqj5jho6teph0jl8dv8ksarnkf48sk3i4@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Riding after heavy manual labor Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 11:27:13 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 55 Message-ID: <duqj5jho6teph0jl8dv8ksarnkf48sk3i4@4ax.com> References: <Sx91O.142$JW17.90@fx12.iad> <v23r8c$1b4fo$1@dont-email.me> <GCl1O.5$XFC9.1@fx06.ams4> <afp1O.2$iJZe.1@fx44.iad> <mlgc4j59jett3eptn4918o63ccs1iti9c9@4ax.com> <v2kr3q$nc4p$2@dont-email.me> <40775j9866udi2dvonrq03bcpum5o8q3t0@4ax.com> <Zu75O.71697$vAv6.66355@fx18.iad> <hktb5jtc5gcloq387a5i8imvqv3c0c2j5f@4ax.com> <v35d6q$o77a$1@dont-email.me> <ebec5j50o2l4pkoboqu1voe563r90ci1f8@4ax.com> <DPl6O.13471$61Y8.6535@fx15.iad> <v3cq25$29evb$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 17:27:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a9d50b97564fa082e495b7d33eb6dfe1"; logging-data="2408496"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18LC4fuBZBQi8Czuq+b9dCEfu8B/Lc+uao=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:f8NOL3DfAgUWryhnKRN53Z8gtuI= Bytes: 3851 On Fri, 31 May 2024 10:23:49 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >On 5/31/2024 10:14 AM, Tom Kunich wrote: >> On Tue May 28 13:25:17 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote: >>> On Tue, 28 May 2024 16:01:30 -0400, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/28/2024 12:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: >>>>> 3.63 lbs of static thrust will lift 3.63 lbs off the ground. That's >>>>> adequate for lifting a small amount of wet grass, but hardly enough to >>>>> lift a grass bag and "suck" it into the blades. >>>> >>>> But that's missing the most salient point: Lawnmowers are designed such >>>> that the bag is unaffected by any suction created under the mower. >>> >>> Umm... that's what I wrote. The static thrust produced by the mower >>> blades acting like a fan isn't going to lift the bag much less suck it >>> into the blades. >>> >>> I'm not sure if unaffected is a suitable description. There is a >>> little suction and therefore there will be some effect. However, for >>> moving the grass clipping into the bag, it's done mostly by >>> centrifugal force. >>> >>>> The only way the bag could get suck into the blades is >>>> if the bag came off the mounts and tommy ran over it. >>> >>> That assumes that Tom owns a lawn mower. >>> I still don't believe that Tom owns a lawn mower for his small lawn. >>> >>>> IOW - tommy was doing it wrong....again. I still suggest MWI. >>> >>> "Can You Get A DUI While Mowing Your Lawn?" >>> <https://www.norcalcriminallaw.com/2018/07/22/dui-laws/> >>> "It is unlawful for a person who is under the influence of an >>> alcoholic beverage to drive a car, or truck, or motorcycle or even a >>> lawn mower." >>> >>> But ossifer, it cuts better with a little ethanol octane booster added >>> to the gasoline. >>> > >> >> You know, I haven't the slightest political ambitions but I just received an invitation to attend the Republican Party Convention in Milwakee complete with a 5 night stay in the Regency(?) hotel. I'm not about to accept that because I have other things to do in July. >> >> Yet another failure of the Liebermann crowd to believe the world revolves around them. > > >Good decision. It may very well be a setup to a redux of >Chicago 1968, based on the other antics of the crooked >Milwaukee democrat regime. What ever possessed them to site >it in Milwaukee? That's crazy. It's not easy to find a city that could host it that isn't run by a crooked democrat regime.