| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<e-WcnYODbIvU22b6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 05:06:16 +0000 Subject: Re: 5 Fun Linux Commands You Should Try At Least Once Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <vshpm2$6sd5$2@dont-email.me> <m53g0mFm5q8U2@mid.individual.net> <67ef0717@news.ausics.net> <vsongu$14lpj$1@news1.tnib.de> <rrd5clxl36.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vsrc4q$1beij$1@news1.tnib.de> <af3aclxo8k.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <67f26f8b$0$28481$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <vsvudd$1mq38$1@news1.tnib.de> <67fa3eb4$0$11423$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <mf0qclxbcb.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> From: c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 01:06:12 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <mf0qclxbcb.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <e-WcnYODbIvU22b6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 47 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-yJLyG7KJni9rGOEF57dEs3IldfZMNzWYVhpPXxGGKxk4leJdYApN9402pVwGSXmJEyHYIYUgQFLTYRG!708Tva464nP/ZQhSgNCLLsGvzUTIyNeMP3ELk8IOYaBwr2s2/jzVKxb6WghKJz6pp1M2Pp2NrmO4 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3517 On 4/12/25 7:47 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-04-12 12:21, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> Le 07-04-2025, Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> a écrit : >>> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: >>>> Le 06-04-2025, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> a écrit : >>>>> On 2025-04-05 15:44, Marc Haber wrote: >>>>>> "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-04-04 15:40, Marc Haber wrote: >>>>>>>> I am an old fart myself, and I refrain from using killall since it >>>>>>>> does different things on Solaris than on Linux. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't have or do any Solaris. >>>>>> >>>>>> And if you do, you'll kill all. >>>>> >>>>> That's fine. >>>> >>>> Same for me. I'm not using Solaris and killall always did what I >>>> wanted, >>>> so except for a good reason, I'll keep using it. >>> >>> The good reason is accident prevention. Like putting on a seat belt. >>> Or not driving on the other side of the road even if noone's there. >> >> For me, it's easier to avoid accident by giving the name of the program >> I want to stop to killall, than by giving the number of the process to >> kill. By far. Because I can make a mistake in copying the process number >> or in looking at the line in which it's displayed. When it's very >> difficult to make a mistake using the name and the tabular key to use >> the name of the process. >> >> So, for me, killall is by far the best way to prevent accidents. And >> knowing it's working differently on slowlaris, which I don't use, isn't >> an interesting reason for me to stop using it. > > Same here. > > The only snag, of course, is that there can be multiple processes. > Hopefully we know that. Run killall as user, not root. Ya know ... big annoyances ... you CAN just re-boot the machine. Clears out LOTS of shit. Takes about 60 seconds max these days. This is not perfect for EVERY possible app, but IS good for MOST of them.