Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:04:14 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e11c6f4f29bb0c77dbd10f8e20bca766712977d0@i2pn2.org>
References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vrqb6f$3k9kh$2@dont-email.me>
 <3f250e699762cfe6fccc844f10eb04f32d470b6a@i2pn2.org>
 <vrrpcl$11a56$4@dont-email.me>
 <8423998561d8feee807509b0ed6335123d35a7c9@i2pn2.org>
 <vrt3gv$264jb$4@dont-email.me>
 <448c82acff6b5fc1d2aa266be92df6f778ec2c6a@i2pn2.org>
 <vru5tp$38ob9$1@dont-email.me>
 <ac61f679d7ddb39b0ceaedd7f562899d36346535@i2pn2.org>
 <vrvccp$aq8m$3@dont-email.me>
 <e166831a8e02332d64ec151f61481e2629e6e53a@i2pn2.org>
 <vrvsh4$p4vd$2@dont-email.me>
 <c93030bbd81fb313c76c256c6e54beb48b07dfdd@i2pn2.org>
 <vs1vuv$2ot1m$1@dont-email.me>
 <d2f86fad6c5823e3c098f30d331576c52263b398@i2pn2.org>
 <vs2fgn$354gv$5@dont-email.me> <vs2u3v$3mcjm$2@dont-email.me>
 <vs434l$mmcb$3@dont-email.me> <vs45a3$resr$1@dont-email.me>
 <vs4ne1$1c1ja$1@dont-email.me> <vs4ovc$1e09p$1@dont-email.me>
 <vs4pg8$1c1ja$6@dont-email.me> <vs4pi9$1e09p$2@dont-email.me>
 <vs4qpp$1c1ja$7@dont-email.me> <vs4r2u$1e09p$3@dont-email.me>
 <vs4snt$1c1ja$9@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 02:06:08 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2053192"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vs4snt$1c1ja$9@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 5162
Lines: 85

On 3/27/25 9:07 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 3/27/2025 7:38 PM, dbush wrote:
>> On 3/27/2025 8:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/27/2025 7:12 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>> On 3/27/2025 8:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 3/27/2025 7:02 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 7:36 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 1:27 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 1:50 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/2025 2:18 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Op 27.mrt.2025 om 04:09 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/26/2025 8:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>>>>>>>> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>>>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp  ; housekeeping
>>>>>>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>>>>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>>>>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404     add  esp,+04
>>>>>>>>>>> [00002182] 5d         pop  ebp
>>>>>>>>>>> [00002183] c3         ret
>>>>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Non-Halting is that the machine won't reach its final staste 
>>>>>>>>>>>> even if an unbounded number of steps are emulated. Since HHH 
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't do that, it isn't showing non-halting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> DDD emulated by any HHH will never reach its final state
>>>>>>>>>>> in an unbounded number of steps.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> DDD emulated by HHH1 reaches its final state in a finite
>>>>>>>>>>> number of steps.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is not very interesting to know whether a simulator reports 
>>>>>>>>>> that it is unable to reach the end of the simulation of a 
>>>>>>>>>> program that halts in direct execution.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That IS NOT what HHH is reporting.
>>>>>>>>> HHH correctly rejects DDD because DDD correctly
>>>>>>>>> emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own
>>>>>>>>> final halt state.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In other words, HHH is not a halt decider because it is not 
>>>>>>>> computing the required mapping:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Troll
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 3:19:42 PM UTC-5, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>  > In other words you could find any error in my post so you 
>>>>>> resort to the
>>>>>>  > lame tactic of ad hominem personal attack.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Troll
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/22/2024 10:51 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>  > *Ad Hominem attacks are the first resort of clueless wonders*
>>>>
>>>
>>> I corrected your error dozens of times and you
>>> ignore these corrections and mindlessly repeat
>>> your error like a bot 
>>
>> Which is what you've been doing for the last three years.
>>
>> Projection, as always.  I'll add the above to the list.
>>
> 
> TM's cannot possibly ever report on the behavior
> of the direct execution of another TM. I proved
> this many times in may ways. Ignoring these proofs
> IT NOT ANY FORM OF REBUTTAL.
> 

Sure they can.

WHere is your proof? And what actual accepted principles is is based on?

It seems to be like most of your ideas, just based on your own lies.

Sorry, all you are doing is proving that you mind lives in the world of 
make-beleive and you have no idea what reality is about.