Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:55:32 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e174ca1c1cbc58c67ffae3b67b69f63f21a82f86@i2pn2.org>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vo7be3$jug$1@dont-email.me>
	<vo7r8d$36ra$3@dont-email.me> <vo9ura$i5ha$1@dont-email.me>
	<voahc5$m3dj$8@dont-email.me> <vocdo9$14kc0$1@dont-email.me>
	<vocpl7$16c4e$4@dont-email.me> <vof56u$1n9k0$1@dont-email.me>
	<vofnj2$1qh2r$2@dont-email.me> <vohrmi$29f46$1@dont-email.me>
	<vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me> <vokdha$2rcqi$1@dont-email.me>
	<vom1fr$34osr$1@dont-email.me>
	<ee9d41d5f1c2a8dd8ff44d3ddeee20d2c3bcccc1@i2pn2.org>
	<vomgd8$3anm4$2@dont-email.me>
	<f5d6cbae83eb89e411d76d1d9ca801ef2678cec2@i2pn2.org>
	<voojl9$3mdke$2@dont-email.me>
	<855e571c6668207809e1eb67138de6af48d164fa@i2pn2.org>
	<vorlqp$aet5$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:55:32 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="300144"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3816
Lines: 44

Am Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:25:12 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 2/15/2025 4:03 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:29:45 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 2/14/2025 6:54 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:21:59 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 2/13/2025 9:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/13/25 7:07 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/13/2025 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-13 04:21:34 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that
>>>>>>>>>>>> article before or when HHH
>>>>>>>>>>> That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been
>>>>>>>>>>> talking about in this forum for several years.
>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about
>>>>>>>>>> that paper.
>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line
>>>>>>>>>> contains a false claim.
>>>>>>>>> It is a truism and not one person on the face of the Earth can
>>>>>>>>> possibly show otherwise.
>>>>>>>> The fact that the claim on subject line is false is not a truism.
>>>>>>>> In order to determine the claim is false one needs some knowledge
>>>>>>>> that is not obvious.
>>>>>>> When you try to show the steps attempting to show that it is false
>>>>>>> I will point out the error.
>>>>>> We havm, but you are too stupid to understand it.
>>>>>> Since when DD run, it halts,
>>>>> THAT IS A DIFFERENT INSTANCE
>>>> Why are you passing the wrong input to HHH?
>>> I will begin ignoring insincere replies.
>> Yes, please shut up.
>> But why are you not passing the same instance to HHH?
> The first instance of recursion is not exactly the same as subsequent
> instances of the exact same sequence of recursive invocations.
> It is the same with recursive simulations. When the second recursive
> invocation has been aborted the first one terminates normally misleading
> people into believing that the recursive chain terminates normally.
How interesting. Might this be due to a global variable that basically
toggles termination?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.