| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<e179dcdbb9b8e7680a8faaa23fdb34f91b4c45e3@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 18:54:59 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <e179dcdbb9b8e7680a8faaa23fdb34f91b4c45e3@i2pn2.org> References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vbt0fs$3pr1d$1@dont-email.me> <vbt15n$3qapk$1@dont-email.me> <btbO__HYVIMPfoOcmXp4_whV8-8@jntp> <vbums6$8kdn$1@dont-email.me> <vbv9i7$bpjh$2@dont-email.me> <13c08e96ad635f8142b38d89863a80caf17a32a8@i2pn2.org> <vc1mfe$u3ec$2@dont-email.me> <4faa63d0ff8c163f01a38736aeb5732184218a29@i2pn2.org> <vc1uu8$u3ec$9@dont-email.me> <vc2gfb$130uk$1@dont-email.me> <vc44uu$1gc40$1@dont-email.me> <c94d6140f000f75c5e95e1acc785ebff9894a18b@i2pn2.org> <vc7dk3$2b1g9$2@dont-email.me> <1aabd037-86bc-47bd-b402-f6b29c5c33e4@att.net> <vcehl6$2boc$3@dont-email.me> <f1d14b16-2c12-4cfb-b7f5-c58cc5724f94@att.net> <vcguvh$hi5j$1@dont-email.me> <b7eb4682-30db-4b37-90b4-0135e995cfc1@att.net> <vckekf$1709o$1@dont-email.me> <298dcb6f-5f58-48b6-80e3-34260bf721f8@att.net> <vcn8n8$1nfqa$1@dont-email.me> <283c426f-ab1c-4ef0-a06c-1bf7d28a2cfa@att.net> <vcpo5e$29qe5$1@dont-email.me> <1b7a9d3f7a0e76bf672b8764f1ece8fe32c167c5@i2pn2.org> <vcroh4$2nfvb$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:54:59 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3208342"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vcroh4$2nfvb$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2619 Lines: 22 On 9/23/24 8:56 AM, WM wrote: > On 23.09.2024 00:53, Richard Damon wrote: > >> Count down from infinity please, what is the actual first number you >> use, (not w-1, that isn't a number). >> >> The problem is it doesn't exist, because the numbers don't have a >> bound on that end. > > The problem is not non-existence. Proof: Chosse the greates existing > number m. Then double it to get 2m. Why didn't you choose 2m originally? > Obviously it exists. > > Regards, WM > Because you asked for something that doesn't exist. There is no largest existing number m, so I guess that says your logic, that created the question, just doesn't exist. Show me a 4 sided triangle.