| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<e206ca375a92b2f29a32f7b386460ea25a2531e9@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 22:36:10 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <e206ca375a92b2f29a32f7b386460ea25a2531e9@i2pn2.org> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <d8bbe664-a601-4590-9a7f-d5312b4dae54@att.net> <F6pqEi9Vg1YMcYTcIPQNs6NU_vI@jntp> <4f606ef2-ef6c-487b-b959-d109e374929f@att.net> <v8mh6f$3mmj9$2@dont-email.me> <I2JWgvxiRMkr8F2KSK6i7i5b1n0@jntp> <v8p1jp$9gvr$1@dont-email.me> <v8p63d$a0fn$2@dont-email.me> <YRqt2RTE0zSHQN0l_bDKeY-9QkM@jntp> <4e68c0fa-a068-487e-bbba-8f908051c99d@att.net> <1LaR3C3TkRhtYie7FCrVnCkvrrY@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 02:36:10 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1715116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: <1LaR3C3TkRhtYie7FCrVnCkvrrY@jntp> Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 1962 Lines: 24 On 8/6/24 4:35 AM, WM wrote: > Le 06/08/2024 à 00:35, Jim Burns a écrit : >> On 8/5/2024 3:21 PM, WM wrote: >>> Le 05/08/2024 à 02:24, Moebius a écrit : >> >>>> ∃^ℵ₀ u ∈ ⅟ℕ: ∀x > 0: u < x (false) . >>> >>> ∃^NUF(x) u ∈ ⅟ℕ: ∀x > 0: u < x true. >> >> ¬∃u ∈ ⅟ℕ: ∀x > 0: u < x > > Right. But with NUF(x) = 1 ==> INVNUF(1) = x we get > > ∃u ∈ ⅟ℕ, u < x, ∀y > x = INVNUF(1). > > Regards, WM > > But INVNUF(1) can't exist, as it will be bigger than 1/ ( ceil(1/INVNUF(1)) +1 ), and 1/ ( ceil(1/INVNUF(1)) +2 ) which are two different unit fractions. And thus proving that it can't exist.