Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<e206ca375a92b2f29a32f7b386460ea25a2531e9@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 22:36:10 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e206ca375a92b2f29a32f7b386460ea25a2531e9@i2pn2.org>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <d8bbe664-a601-4590-9a7f-d5312b4dae54@att.net>
 <F6pqEi9Vg1YMcYTcIPQNs6NU_vI@jntp>
 <4f606ef2-ef6c-487b-b959-d109e374929f@att.net> <v8mh6f$3mmj9$2@dont-email.me>
 <I2JWgvxiRMkr8F2KSK6i7i5b1n0@jntp> <v8p1jp$9gvr$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8p63d$a0fn$2@dont-email.me> <YRqt2RTE0zSHQN0l_bDKeY-9QkM@jntp>
 <4e68c0fa-a068-487e-bbba-8f908051c99d@att.net>
 <1LaR3C3TkRhtYie7FCrVnCkvrrY@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 02:36:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1715116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <1LaR3C3TkRhtYie7FCrVnCkvrrY@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1962
Lines: 24

On 8/6/24 4:35 AM, WM wrote:
> Le 06/08/2024 à 00:35, Jim Burns a écrit :
>> On 8/5/2024 3:21 PM, WM wrote:
>>> Le 05/08/2024 à 02:24, Moebius a écrit :
>>
>>>> ∃^ℵ₀ u ∈ ⅟ℕ: ∀x > 0: u < x   (false) .
>>>
>>> ∃^NUF(x) u ∈ ⅟ℕ: ∀x > 0: u < x true.
>>
>> ¬∃u ∈ ⅟ℕ: ∀x > 0: u < x
> 
> Right. But with NUF(x) = 1 ==> INVNUF(1) = x we get
> 
> ∃u ∈ ⅟ℕ, u < x, ∀y > x = INVNUF(1).
> 
> Regards, WM
> 
> 

But INVNUF(1) can't exist, as it will be bigger than

1/ ( ceil(1/INVNUF(1)) +1 ), and 1/ ( ceil(1/INVNUF(1)) +2 )
which are two different unit fractions.

And thus proving that it can't exist.