Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<e2a083120d41675bc620acb5904409f5f95c32b3@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Kicking the straw-man deception
 out on its ass
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 08:27:40 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e2a083120d41675bc620acb5904409f5f95c32b3@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq2i40$ug75$3@dont-email.me> <vq2l9p$tth2$2@dont-email.me>
	<vq2m2p$vkkb$1@dont-email.me>
	<7b0a90e744f28e7dfe86481ba3eb5b438b6d2af4@i2pn2.org>
	<vq3073$vkkb$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 08:27:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2616569"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 19:21:39 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 3/2/2025 6:42 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 3/2/25 5:28 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/2/2025 4:15 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 02.mrt.2025 om 22:21 schreef olcott:

>>>> In other words 'non terminating behavior' means that *HHH* was unable
>>>> to reach the 'ret' instruction.
>>>
>>> Not at all. The fact that DD calls its own emulator makes DD unable to
>>> reach its own "ret" instruction.
>>>
>> No, it calls a specific emulator, that of a given HHH. There is no
>> requirement for the program DD to be emulated by that program.
>> 
> THE FACT THAT DD DOES CALL ITS OWN EMULATOR
> MAKES DD UNABLE TO REACH ITS OWN "ret" INSTRUCTION
DD reaches its return instruction.
But HHH can't simulate itself.

> That I did not think of those words two years ago seems to make me a
> moron about effective communication.
Yay for introspection!

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.