Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 16:55:51 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <e3a7231ccaeda2a33dcba756f18dd831@www.novabbs.com>
References: <0dd990630edbc9332716605722eb087a@www.novabbs.com> <137de285af1075fd38879770e4639130@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2421907"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$1QkGkEb7HWEpVRoIuOaNvuh6O0nQ1dGRgdJjC4W0XdSjpMnYPfpzq
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 5106
Lines: 100

On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 15:37:50 +0000, gharnagel wrote:

> On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 0:50:18 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>>
>> In 1930 Wolfgang Pauli  proposed the existence of the neutrino (named in
>> 1933 by Fermi) to solve the violation of energy conservation in beta
>> decay (when a neutron turns into a proton and emits an electron).
>> Scientists observed that the emitted electrons had varying energies,
>> rather than a fixed value as expected. The neutrino was ALLEGEDLY
>> detected experimentally by Cowan and Reines in 1956.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowan%E2%80%93Reines_neutrino_experiment
>
> "Allegedly"? Is there an alternative explanation for positrons
> being created in water close to a nuclear reactor?
>
>> ....
>>
>> Up to date, the neutinos mass is UNKNOWN.
>
> This is a bit disingenuous.  Neutrino mass is known to be less
> than 0.45 eV at 90% confidence: arXiv:2406.13516.
>
>> ....
>>
>> MY CONCLUSION: Physics needs that neutrinos REALLY EXIST, otherwise the
>> law of conservation of energy is violated.
>
> Why do you believe that energy is not conserved?  I mean, CoE has been
> confirmed consistently in engineering and experimental physics.  Even
> so,
> most physicists didn't go along with Pauli's hypothesis at the time.
>
> "I have done a terrible thing, I have postulated a particle that cannot
> be detected." – Wolfgang Pauli
>
>> How neutrinos are generated IS UNKNOWN.
>
> They are generated in nuclear reactions.  What's so unknown about that?
>
>> If neutrinos have mass or not IS UNKNOWN.
>
> Logical fallacy. Straw man argument.
>
>> Tens of billions of USD wasted for nothing,
>
> What about medicare payments to people 150+ years old?  They're less
> detectable than neutrinos :-)
>
>> The existence of cosmic neutrinos is essential in astrophysics to
>> FILL THE VOID in calculations. Also, in cosmology, their role is
>> essential for such unproven theories like the BB.
>
> When you have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail :-)
>
>> I smell a rotten fish around this.
>
> If your fish were frozen in IceCube, it would be sun-tanned with
> Cerenkov radiation generated from pieces of atoms suddenly
> accelerated to hundreds of keV by ... nothing?
>
>> Meanwhile, physicists making six figures plus expenses are more than
>> happy, and have zero accountability.
>>
>> HOAX!
>
> No one has seen an electron, so radio, tv, radar, computers, cars,
> electricity are all HOAXES!


ENERGY IS NOT CONSERVED AT ALL. IT'S VALID ONLY ON EARTH AMONG A GROUP
OF SELF-ENTITLED INDIVIDUALS CALLED PHYSICISTS. THEY FIGHT FOR THE
INVIOLABLE DOGMA OF THE LCE, OTHERWISE THEY AND THEIR CAREER ARE FUCKED.

AT THE BEGINNING OF XIX CENTURY, NATURAL PHILOSOPHERS (A.K.A.
PHYSICISTS) WERE GLAD TO INCLUDE HEAT IN THE OVERALL ACCOUNT OF ENERGY
WITHIN A CLOSED SYSTEM. THEY'VE RESTED ON THIS CONCEPT AND THE ONE OF
MOMENTUM CONSERVATION, SO THEIR EXCEL CALCULATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE.

UNLESS THAT, IN ANOTHER MACRO-SCALE (LIKE THE UNIVERSE) THINGS ABOUT THE
AMOUNT OF MATTER THAT'S CALCULATED DISAGREE WITH THE FUCKING RELATIVITY.
THEN THEY CAME WITH THE CRAP OF DARK MATTER AND ENERGY FOR THE 95$
MISSING. SAME SHIT THAN WITH NEUTRINOS IN THE QUANTUM WORLD.

THAT ENERGY CONSERVATION (AS WELL AS MOMENTUM CONSERVATION) ARE JUST
MYTHS, THERE IS THE THEORY OF THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE FROM A
PROVERBIAL ATOM THAT WENT OFF (FROM THE JESUIT PHYSICIST, 100 YEARS
AGO). EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE ROTATES, AND THERE ARE NOT ANY SINGLE
PROOF THAT THERE ARE EQUAL AMOUNTS OF ROTATIONS CLOCKWISE AND
COUNTERCLOCKWISE IN ALL THE CELESTIAL BODIES THAT JUSTIFY SUCH STUPID
IDEA (JUST BECAUSE LOCALLY IT SOUND NICE).

SAME WITH MASS CONSERVATION LAW (STILL EXIST, ISN'T IT?). WHERE IS THE
SAME AMOUNT OF ANTI-MATTER TO COUNTERACT THE MATTER EXPELLED FROM THE
POINT THAT EXPLODED?

PHYSICS IS A FUCKING FARCE, VALID ONLY FOR PARASITES (AND NOBEL
ENCOURAGED IT).

THE WORLD DEVELOPED THANKS TO INVENTORS AND ENGINEER SINCE SUMERIAN
TIMES, OR MUCH OLDER THAN THAT.