Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<e55475b3fede49578ff8924bb11ffae6bbd577f3@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 07:27:30 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e55475b3fede49578ff8924bb11ffae6bbd577f3@i2pn2.org>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <38ec6fd291b3b6d6f41db8be499a710a8abe39f9@i2pn2.org>
 <fE1naizk8McRI8kMur_IKqjaiuU@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:27:30 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="530839"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <fE1naizk8McRI8kMur_IKqjaiuU@jntp>
Bytes: 1768
Lines: 27

On 7/27/24 7:13 AM, WM wrote:
> Le 27/07/2024 à 04:23, Richard Damon a écrit :
> 
>> By your logic, if you take a set and replace every element with a 
>> number that is twice that value, it would by the rule of construction 
>> say they must be the same size.
> 
> That is true in potential infinity. But I assume actual infinity.
>>

So, what part is not true? Are you stating that replacing every element 
with another unique distinct element something that make the set change 
size?


>> But that resultant set is the evens, which can also be shown by your 
>> logic to have less elements than the Natural Numbers they were made 
>> from by doubling,
> 
> So it is.

WHich shows the logic to be wrong.

> 
> Regards, WM
> 
>