Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<e55475b3fede49578ff8924bb11ffae6bbd577f3@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 07:27:30 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <e55475b3fede49578ff8924bb11ffae6bbd577f3@i2pn2.org> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <38ec6fd291b3b6d6f41db8be499a710a8abe39f9@i2pn2.org> <fE1naizk8McRI8kMur_IKqjaiuU@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:27:30 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="530839"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <fE1naizk8McRI8kMur_IKqjaiuU@jntp> Bytes: 1768 Lines: 27 On 7/27/24 7:13 AM, WM wrote: > Le 27/07/2024 à 04:23, Richard Damon a écrit : > >> By your logic, if you take a set and replace every element with a >> number that is twice that value, it would by the rule of construction >> say they must be the same size. > > That is true in potential infinity. But I assume actual infinity. >> So, what part is not true? Are you stating that replacing every element with another unique distinct element something that make the set change size? >> But that resultant set is the evens, which can also be shown by your >> logic to have less elements than the Natural Numbers they were made >> from by doubling, > > So it is. WHich shows the logic to be wrong. > > Regards, WM > >