| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<e6b0d7d07a26937299f09cb4ba9ea722696b050a@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:10:26 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <e6b0d7d07a26937299f09cb4ba9ea722696b050a@i2pn2.org> References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vqrn89$u9t$1@news.muc.de> <vqrp47$2gl70$1@dont-email.me> <vqrtn3$1uq5$1@news.muc.de> <vqs1og$2k7oh$2@dont-email.me> <d7793397-d27c-4a5e-938e-5bb52a89ddda@att.net> <vqspuj$2p6pb$2@dont-email.me> <163d9b2e-c83f-41d2-a895-65cf4e152a66@att.net> <vqud0b$36bb4$3@dont-email.me> <8e684425-63cb-4d9c-9124-ee07acdd9017@att.net> <vr1eo0$1er2v$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:10:26 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="131589"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Am Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:33:36 +0100 schrieb WM: > On 13.03.2025 20:41, Jim Burns wrote: >> On 3/13/2025 6:45 AM, WM wrote: >>> On 13.03.2025 01:43, Jim Burns wrote: >> >>>> A single (lossless) exchange cannot delete an O Finitely.many >>>> (lossless) exchanges cannot delete an O >>>> Infinitely.many (lossless) exchanges can delete an O >>> No. >> Your "No" responds to infiniteᵂᴹ, but I wrote infiniteⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ. > My "No" responds to every finity and every infinity. Logic never ceases > to be valid. Lossless exchange is lossless. ....except when the logic of the infinite says otherwise. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.