Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <e6b0d7d07a26937299f09cb4ba9ea722696b050a@i2pn2.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<e6b0d7d07a26937299f09cb4ba9ea722696b050a@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark
 numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series]
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:10:26 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e6b0d7d07a26937299f09cb4ba9ea722696b050a@i2pn2.org>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vqrn89$u9t$1@news.muc.de>
	<vqrp47$2gl70$1@dont-email.me> <vqrtn3$1uq5$1@news.muc.de>
	<vqs1og$2k7oh$2@dont-email.me>
	<d7793397-d27c-4a5e-938e-5bb52a89ddda@att.net>
	<vqspuj$2p6pb$2@dont-email.me>
	<163d9b2e-c83f-41d2-a895-65cf4e152a66@att.net>
	<vqud0b$36bb4$3@dont-email.me>
	<8e684425-63cb-4d9c-9124-ee07acdd9017@att.net>
	<vr1eo0$1er2v$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:10:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="131589"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

Am Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:33:36 +0100 schrieb WM:
> On 13.03.2025 20:41, Jim Burns wrote:
>> On 3/13/2025 6:45 AM, WM wrote:
>>> On 13.03.2025 01:43, Jim Burns wrote:
>> 
>>>> A single (lossless) exchange cannot delete an O Finitely.many
>>>> (lossless) exchanges cannot delete an O
>>>> Infinitely.many (lossless) exchanges can delete an O
>>> No. 
>> Your "No" responds to infiniteᵂᴹ, but I wrote infiniteⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ.
> My "No" responds to every finity and every infinity. Logic never ceases
> to be valid. Lossless exchange is lossless.
....except when the logic of the infinite says otherwise.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.