Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 13:52:42 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <e71f5aeb52b8e43d63cd07c49c52290f@www.novabbs.org>
References: <bee82c477b86c0caf1c30da405ed870f@www.novabbs.com> <2736efff510c6bd82bb36405c0266886@www.novabbs.org> <a91e5a8ee6f1d0fc0d6c0345eecbed88@www.novabbs.com> <f54cc98a1ca9712bd0fc8f0e9e9dcb6f@www.novabbs.org> <4a488e12f89b5ee90c3e6caf0d297ee0@www.novabbs.com> <2113c1adc41242e8d1de22474a38ffb1@www.novabbs.org> <7a0a2ba5ab8a05be3176a6450fa1ba3b@www.novabbs.com> <28fd78b7ca19c29f2f6ac7b1feb7f429@www.novabbs.org> <bb8cc8f4c7094cf19f9ed9dafdb6421d@www.novabbs.com> <bb4c84c3e23e8ca09e3909d612dcd7c1@www.novabbs.org> <25ec1a1df90bd53463eefcbc4afeb68c@www.novabbs.com> <f67777144db436263c7268d335fa108f@www.novabbs.org> <7452e50c8223e602e9f3c75732015fa0@www.novabbs.org> <f490622d60a05a2790457c50589db537@www.novabbs.com> <40f9cc6cff2ba1fc5c165b0afb86577f@www.novabbs.org> <fae0b42a5cf0d668ba051ad3fc7e7de3@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2967438"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="8Ljlg8xw5cAHatvjdHGGjEHKUx9ddlqxMwQzk4UFm4k";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$HdJiofeqWC4r.DiPg.F3NOt481tF2gPqABuUsY9ZME736PdcDZpom
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d6bc49351b0faa08a25d2b434d815198335a8b45

On Thu, 29 May 2025 23:33:36 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

> On Thu, 29 May 2025 23:14:23 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 29 May 2025 21:20:42 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 29 May 2025 13:10:19 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>>>
>>>> You see, just as light leaves the emitter it must go on in a straight
>>>> line at some speed. If at time T it leaves point A to reach point B,
>>>> where el=AB, then as the Earth moves the point B with respect to A has
>>>> moved by distance v * (t=time to travel AB) so B is now at B+vt when A
>>>> is at A+vt. So the distance light travels after emission is el+vt. And
>>>> not el as every book shows. Which is the bungle.
>>>>
>>>> For the null to happen light must travel faster than C. It has to travel
>>>> at C+v. So if the Earth moves light speed is variant.
>>>>
>>>> Woof woof woof-woof
>>>>
>>>> Bertietaylor
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Yes, the speed of the light beams in the MMX moved at c + 30 km/sec
>>> proving that relative light speed is variant.
>>
>> Great. So as light speed is variant e=mcc is wrong and aether exists for
>> inertia does not hold for certain electric circuits.
>>
>> Now heaps of work for physicists of the scientific sort. Revise texts.
>>
>> WOOF woof-woof woof
>>
>> Bertietaylor
>>
>> --
> Whether one is speaking of waves or particles to deny relative velocity
> is so illogical as to be irrational.

It is a crazy world. The sane people are called crazy by the
bloodsucking parasites.

--