| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<e7266d3fa377791e52f8f47dc93211959b861651@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: 2N=E Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 20:55:18 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <e7266d3fa377791e52f8f47dc93211959b861651@i2pn2.org> References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <5b701e07-18aa-42ab-964b-0ca84e1776ca@att.net> <fb930b22-7f79-4a10-858d-a1a9faccc9b9@tha.de> <e2e906ae-48c5-453b-a38f-94c1ebc9ba6b@att.net> <vfgiqa$38oob$1@dont-email.me> <d781add9-cd6b-4fff-9601-111c74f4ae32@att.net> <vfgqa8$39o4h$1@dont-email.me> <a45b5e62-4b8c-4428-83ef-8b9bf62d6981@att.net> <vfj3e9$1e96h$1@solani.org> <40b398d1-40c5-45e9-8615-1cf437af0185@att.net> <vfoqi1$14lcd$6@dont-email.me> <3537899e-e951-4138-b56c-fc76340762b8@att.net> <vftj9t$26ql2$1@dont-email.me> <8b31df46-1361-4dd1-aed3-1f42039af960@att.net> <vfu2qi$29m4j$2@dont-email.me> <84c1bb5d-67db-4d21-918a-f86cd1f815c5@att.net> <vfvefj$9264$2@solani.org> <ca84d22c-3684-4744-a145-a941bac4651f@att.net> <vg0iba$2q8fo$1@dont-email.me> <c2087013-5e5c-4e01-b356-29ffa484bfc2@att.net> <vg0p6j$2ra8e$1@dont-email.me> <725d3aed-1de6-48e9-97a4-fe861ce58a6f@att.net> <vg2a87$36ojq$3@dont-email.me> <470a5a63-4d1d-402d-bbc8-b5fc8ea299c1@att.net> <vg333m$3b2rd$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 00:55:18 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="526292"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <vg333m$3b2rd$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2376 Lines: 16 On 11/1/24 1:28 PM, WM wrote: > On 01.11.2024 15:02, Jim Burns wrote: > >> 'Infinity' does not mean what you want it to mean. > > Infinity can have two meanings. I have no preference. > But if the meaning of invariable sets is used, then every doubling will > produce numbers larger than all doubled elements of the set. > > Regards, WM > > Nope. That is just your finite thinking getting in the way. You forget that the infinite set has no end, and thus you can't go past the end by that operation.