| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<e761e5bb946465b23a4d32a9be1076b395ee18e8@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 15:24:16 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <e761e5bb946465b23a4d32a9be1076b395ee18e8@i2pn2.org> References: <vmo1bs$1rnl$1@dont-email.me> <ee4e189d-56bc-4ed7-b7b7-cd71fc4d2349@att.net> <vmqh9k$urua$1@dont-email.me> <903de8e1-3538-4cfe-9f7a-6509eda47ab6@att.net> <vmsvfv$1hn5k$1@dont-email.me> <3844edd7-0750-4418-bff6-2759817446b3@att.net> <vmvn1h$25r19$1@dont-email.me> <27377646-137a-4f8f-a7bb-a75707b2da96@att.net> <vn2gcf$2ouuo$2@dont-email.me> <965ee9868f28953d437113d0d38f069815499a3f@i2pn2.org> <vn4sfi$3ijdb$2@dont-email.me> <e51fcde5622ccc6beab7882831e5f7033c04d150@i2pn2.org> <vn5gur$3qu1c$3@dont-email.me> <77fb6230f3ef78f7524b70785c4772313e238258@i2pn2.org> <vn7r2r$q7sl$2@dont-email.me> <814297ada299a65bb9f427ddec5646afcc94be9f@i2pn2.org> <vn85es$u7pk$2@dont-email.me> <f753327bd316219fc9f04a8626b725956bfe8c9a@i2pn2.org> <vna675$1ng1j$1@dont-email.me> <b9a5e6e3397b079bfb37f810d53d3491a400b3d6@i2pn2.org> <vnasam$1s6ha$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 15:24:16 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1513733"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2181 Lines: 12 Am Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:15:35 +0100 schrieb WM: > On 28.01.2025 13:45, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 1/28/25 3:58 AM, WM wrote: > >> Many sets of FISONs whose union is N exist, and each of those sets has >> a first element. > Name the first element of only one of those sets which is required in > that set. Nobody said it was necessary. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.