Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<e7mpbj10hscdt7lh8rb1smih03fmqgls7l@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: rant
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 12:19:36 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <e7mpbj10hscdt7lh8rb1smih03fmqgls7l@4ax.com>
References: <XnsB1C3E64D4C3AAmpndisorg@135.181.20.170> <v8o92t$4ktk$1@dont-email.me> <v8vk94$us4$3@ereborbbs.duckdns.org> <lhuuhvFlce3U2@mid.individual.net> <XnsB1CCDCF36CB8mpndisorg@135.181.20.170> <38pmbjd03lmv0voha1ma5gpo6pthutm805@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:21:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1bfc074d1dafc03ee5566009869c5ddd";
	logging-data="562288"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/k+nzZItvck/Qm+EXiGLa5"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zyav5HpdwjFRd5rGzYNn7r9NVco=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.640
Bytes: 2293

Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs
say:

>On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 04:43:13 -0000 (UTC), "Mark P. Nelson"
><markpnelson@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>Altered Beast <j63480576@gmail.com> wrote in news:lhuuhvFlce3U2@mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> 
>>> What units are computing power measured in?
>>
>>Never mind the mathetical operations, I always like to measure this in monk-hours as a 
>>matter of practical productivity. Considering how much text a computer could output, via a 
>>decent printer, in one second, how long would it have taken one monk, using a quill and 
>>parchment, to produce the same number of verses, with or without illuminated caps?
>>
>>But, if you insist on FLOPS, consider a monk with a quill and parchment. How long will it 
>>take him to solve a given quadratic equation versus the computer's performance?
>>
>
>It depends on the monk, I suppose. Are we running these maths on a
>'Thomas Aquinas' processor or a 'Bob-the-Inebriated-Dribbler' core?
>
>;-)


Or Rainman the Monk.

A savant will outperform a computer every time in their field.

Xocyll