| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<e8c2adfd5adcc814df0a29c26f68f3d9@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: do you believe we can quantize =?UTF-8?B?Z3Jhdml0eT8=?= Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 23:52:52 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <e8c2adfd5adcc814df0a29c26f68f3d9@www.novabbs.com> References: <j9oiptyjxgxi$.dlg@tomato.potato> <8b32d768d4eb5cd8a3e1e1796e3cdba8@www.novabbs.com> <sbirtk-56q42.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <eaf2af09821e0f3c4e780f09cfb742fd@www.novabbs.com> <02cff57f49c5b9f6ef0d33441951cb1e@www.novabbs.com> <lqsstk-85j62.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <678b32e2a0eba553fdcf24b9489cc5d5@www.novabbs.com> <4e36753b-0086-f154-ff9f-9569905d4d03@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <8a2fec3afd134f31003049fa8aa4d201@www.novabbs.com> <j9p3uk-1isg2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2510912"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$qGKMXTtMZtVw7pAEiUq/E.dOA.9FRlfqHbizpXJv0bimnEbjF5/t. Bytes: 3277 Lines: 50 On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 3:42:13 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > > <snip old craP> > >> Fully agree so all decent scientists must carefully read and see the >> physics works of Arindam. Then verify by repeating his rail gun > > It seems that you haven't a clue what the word "railgun" means crackpot. > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railgun > > "A railgun or rail gun, sometimes referred to as a rail cannon, is a > linear motor device, typically designed as a weapon, that uses > electromagnetic force to launch high-velocity projectiles." > > https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rail%20gun > > "an electromagnetic catapult designed to hurl projectiles at > extremely high speeds" > > https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rail-gun > > "a weapon consisting of a pair of parallel conductive rails, using a > magnetic field and electric current to launch projectiles at very > high velocity" > > https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/railgun > > "a gun that uses electromagnetic force to propel a projectile at > very high speeds" > > https://www.yourdictionary.com/rail-gun > > "A weapon, consisting mainly of conducting metal rails, that uses > electromagnetic force to accelerate a projectile to a much greater > speed than that achieved by conventional chemical propellant weapons." > > To be a railgun, the device has to launch a projectile. > > All your videos clearly show that your device propels an armature down > a track at low speed where it falls off at the end. That is NOT a > railgun > and is nothing more than a linear motor. It is most certainly a linear motor like a railgun but over 1000 times more efficient with its new design. Trillions of dollars will turn it into reactionless motors for interstellar travel. Lots of work to be done once the physics behind it gets due publicity.