Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<e927b5c876314add491c7e50071156e92ef307e7@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies
 non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:59:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e927b5c876314add491c7e50071156e92ef307e7@i2pn2.org>
References: <vnumf8$24cq0$1@dont-email.me> <vo2us8$32kg8$1@dont-email.me>
	<228a9804d6919149bac728ccf08134ed90db121e@i2pn2.org>
	<vo3cf0$35449$1@dont-email.me>
	<6f15178eda69b13fae9cbfef29acad05c9c6aeb3@i2pn2.org>
	<vo3t3n$37kcg$1@dont-email.me>
	<1454e934b709b66a0cb9de9e9796cb46fed0425c@i2pn2.org>
	<vo5c8c$3ipo2$2@dont-email.me>
	<f7f9c03f97de054f6393139c74f595f68400ede5@i2pn2.org>
	<vo6b14$3o0uo$1@dont-email.me>
	<274abb70abec9d461ac3eb34c0980b7421f5fabd@i2pn2.org>
	<vo6rhd$3tsq7$1@dont-email.me> <vo79pq$8vq$2@dont-email.me>
	<vo7qqb$36ra$2@dont-email.me> <vo8jr6$7fbd$2@dont-email.me>
	<vo9gth$fuct$2@dont-email.me> <vo9o3h$gu6t$2@dont-email.me>
	<voah0r$m3dj$6@dont-email.me> <voambu$ng5r$2@dont-email.me>
	<voamvc$nv62$1@dont-email.me> <voatki$p4au$2@dont-email.me>
	<voau7d$p4sc$2@dont-email.me> <voavuf$p4au$4@dont-email.me>
	<vob15v$ptj9$1@dont-email.me> <vocd0e$14a92$1@dont-email.me>
	<vocp7p$16c4e$2@dont-email.me> <vocqjl$16qj7$1@dont-email.me>
	<vocrbl$16uuv$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:59:49 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3557886"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 4523
Lines: 51

Am Mon, 10 Feb 2025 06:27:33 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 2/10/2025 6:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 10.feb.2025 om 12:51 schreef olcott:
>>> On 2/10/2025 2:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 09.feb.2025 om 20:54 schreef olcott:
>>>>> On 2/9/2025 1:33 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>> Op 09.feb.2025 om 20:04 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>> On 2/9/2025 12:54 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>> Op 09.feb.2025 om 18:00 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2025 10:50 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Op 09.feb.2025 om 16:18 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2025 2:13 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 09.feb.2025 om 07:10 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/2025 3:54 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 08.feb.2025 om 15:47 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/2025 3:57 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 08.feb.2025 om 06:53 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/2025 7:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/25 8:12 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/2025 5:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/25 11:26 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/2025 6:20 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/25 10:02 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2025 8:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/25 5:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2025 1:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/25 1:26 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2025 10:52 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 05.02.2025 um 16:11 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/2025 1:44 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 05.02.2025 um 04:38 schrieb olcott:

>>>>>>> It is a verified fact that main cannot possibly be correctly
>>>>>>> simulated by HHH until its normal termination.
>>>>>> Indeed, which proves that HHH is unable to simulate itself
>>>>>> correctly.
>>>>> If this was true then you could point out exactly where HHH is
>>>>> incorrect.
Line 502.

>>>> It is true as a verified fact and has been pointed out to Olcott many
>>>> times, but he refuses to learn. So, again:
>>>> It is a verified fact that main halts,
>>> It is a verified fact that the input to HHH(main) cannot possibly
>>> terminate normally.
>> No, the verified fact is that the input can terminatie normally
> The directly executed main IS NOT THE INPUT TO HHH.
It’s not? What if it were? 

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.