Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<eBOdnWTTnqoxuTX6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 03:44:43 +0000 Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy References: <vkjmdg$30kff$1@dont-email.me> <CaidP.24348$DPp5.20979@fx01.iad> <3002e7b9-095e-c292-1202-b151f7776587@example.net> <ltmbcmFjcgpU1@mid.individual.net> <ba6263f8-1e7f-5eb1-ae06-757f2ed7a018@example.net> <lto9qbFso18U3@mid.individual.net> <slrnvnegk1.2cl6d.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <8b262a1f-507f-ef10-e4d3-a981dca5b7d1@example.net> <vl8jdq$3st6d$1@dont-email.me> <vl8jul$3sqfa$4@dont-email.me> <vl8otk$3splv$3@dont-email.me> <vl8qm7$3u6t2$1@dont-email.me> <vl93dl$3vkun$1@dont-email.me> <vl9449$3vo6h$3@dont-email.me> <vl9aov$pp7$1@dont-email.me> <vla4hr$5n4v$1@dont-email.me> <vlblqj$harb$1@dont-email.me> <lttopaFoh2cU8@mid.individual.net> <vle8uk$12sii$2@dont-email.me> <c686fb74-4fac-0809-7005-417c76ee0e3b@example.net> <nbReP.633803$oR74.271654@fx16.iad> <NnVeP.44028$vfee.11890@fx45.iad> <vo6ubb$3ue2q$2@dont-email.me> <RhOdnY5Kb8vulDr6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vo7lp6$25uo$2@dont-email.me> <655acbf6-05e5-69ff-8a44-9f7075aafa2e@example.net> <vo8b6g$69pr$2@dont-email.me> From: "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> Organization: WokieSux Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 22:44:42 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <vo8b6g$69pr$2@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <eBOdnWTTnqoxuTX6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> Lines: 55 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-Cj1Xg3RB598JucfLV+TB4UXIe9b2xNiYIBAemS1+Ny4dyPIP3ayfTTf1j7wl2Cn8GzGxteGDik0KcaX!WrBwhC1BRjd4FwBWo3kXdq7sYrNhmMUfHint06FtTtJR80hvlKLW4YQrTSl6ixZ0QnBgMTdvAD3P!LFhIAJ3OUyFf64PhLGNY X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4527 On 2/8/25 2:27 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 08/02/2025 17:59, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>> or even professional, user. >>> >>> In my careers - I have had several - us Engineers were humble >>> creatures who wrote clean workmanlike well documented and tested code >>> in the hope that no one would ever have to write it again, and if >>> they did, it would be instantly understandable. Code was. to quote my >>> friend 'Higgy', 'all just bits, in silicon'. >>> >>> Later I encountered computer scientists who spoke a strange language >>> with artistic terms in it like 'elegance' 'intellectual purity' >>> 'algorithmic efficiency' 'Turing complete' 'object oriented' and >>> other words that seemed to have nothing whatever to do with actually >>> writing testing and debugging clean code that met the spec and worked >>> in a timescale less than eternity... >>> >>> I decided they were all frustrated ArtStudents™ with Physics envy who >>> could not do HardSums™ >> >> Haha, brilliant! >> >>> And should never be let anywhere near a critical project. >> >> I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there >> can be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy >> in his room who just pounded out the code and got the work done. >> >> I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best >> documented way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without >> the official training is able to do it. >> >> Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A >> students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the >> theory part however, they were always the A students. > > There is computer science, and there is software engineering. > Textbooks on software engineering are worth reading "Computer science" can be interesting - although not very accessible to those with sub-Turing IQ. But "software engineering" is really Where It's At.