Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <eN6cnRy1afc0GuL7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<eN6cnRy1afc0GuL7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:03:53 +0000
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Mozilla-News-Host: snews://giganews.com:443
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Subject: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^2
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:04:18 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <eN6cnRy1afc0GuL7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 26
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-y4Qo0wdcd9GJCrvsFUc60oiMD0TCOA+0Y1yBBtdS0ZaBtHdr6CXflgPybxzIt+7lIpFchC3fXLG+hqY!pvifJ17F/cVbls1ZcqwtK1Wl+UC9i3optoFZ9sJdMFPm6CtYb9tqFDfVNRVsiG/Jc+L+QZVlj3iW
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 1973

In "Out of My Later Years", Einstein's introduces another
mass-energy equivalence formula after kinetic terms.

So if it's sort of Einstein's second-most famous formula,
why hasn't anybody heard of it?

m'/m = e/c^2

It introduces that the terms in the rotational, make
for that mass-energy equivalence only sits in the
rotational setting, among all the other usual terms.

It's introduced in a brief note near the end of
the material on science in Einstein's "Out of My
Later Years".

It really makes for a sort of way to make it so
that the space-contraction results real while
also that the linear is rather Galilean, while
still fulfilling all the usual derivations, if
not necessarily the rhetoric or intuitions,
yet very intuitionistically while all formally.


It's pretty great I wonder why it's not well-known.