Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <eZ4DeEDJTHryoa52-kzkaonijtA@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Getting there at last...
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <l71kmnFje11U1@mid.individual.net> <660BAEAC.433D@ix.netcom.com>
 <l749ffF14h9U1@mid.individual.net> <KhZ2Hz2FE9CXExXJ8V8CpS5cLpw@jntp> <l79onlFqd6dU1@mid.individual.net>
 <IXQv8LazUgNGHOfaop5NsVJfpZ0@jntp> <l7ca43F7jrnU1@mid.individual.net> <VtWMPcrsP6z8IXS625c43CiJiag@jntp>
 <l7g8lmFprkqU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: 8NtFFy9YiPOI1XjPeSRLJ02K38g
JNTP-ThreadID: 5ipMllmo3ZDdVjvYIsvl1ofrDVs
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=eZ4DeEDJTHryoa52-kzkaonijtA@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 24 01:36:45 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/121.0.0.0
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="601f4a4a60dc6043f0c3ab83656fd85fb6bc327d"; logging-data="2024-04-08T01:36:45Z/8809410"; posting-account="219@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Bytes: 2253
Lines: 19

Le 08/04/2024 à 04:58, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> Am 07.04.2024 um 03:25 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
> 
> 
>>>>
>>>> The eminence of relativity today is not due to any science, but to
>>>> politics driven by money, media and academia on one hand, and the fear
>>>> of nukes by the public on the other, which wrongly thinks that the great
>>>> energies released are due to e=mcc.
>>>>
>>>>> It is a principle, which is VERY counterintuitive and not discussed
>>>>> very often:
>>>>
>>>> It is nonsense, period.
>>> No.
Let us agree to disagree.
That goes for all the rest of your arguments, below, afaiac.
- snip -
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee